Why E=MC^2 is a THEORY.

[b_rod]

Says the guy who failed the computer science program.  

States the guy only sourcing when he doesn't make claims. Only using sources when you state scientific facts, yet FAIL to show proof of any of your claims.

 

 

You are too smart for me! Asking for help to show why String is a theory!

 

You sure are too smart for me, I wonder why your fellow believers keep making comments about my educational  comments. They think I get my stuff from PF.com, you know the experts!

 

Sorry, I am too smart for your simple mind. Oh yeah, I failed computer science....    Whatever makes you feel better FLABBY CHEST!

 

BTW, E=/=mc^2, the proof? Because you don't understand it and you said so!

[8v10un30sun]

Talk to MIT.  You owe me $300.

[b_rod]

Talk to MIT.  You owe me $300.

 

Says the guy running from posting his professor from UCB. BTW, the bet is still here, let me know when you want to place the bet and list your Professor.

 

I want to show the professor what a moron a student of his is.

 

[8v10un30sun]

Why don't you talk to UCB professor and have him come on here to talk to us.  List his credentials and who he is.  I'll debate him on the flowchart.  If such a professor would be dumb enough to even discredit the flowchart, I want to debate him and submit the article to the Dean because such a baffoon should not be molding the minds of the future with whackass concepts that theories cannot become laws because I have two incident where a theory becomes law and if I keep digging I'm sure things like Planck's Law and etc... met the criteria.

Bring the heat please...It's so cold here.   

[HmonGuy]

8v and b-rod....you both don't seem to know enough about the subject yourself. merely stated what others have said does not proof anything. you're just confusing bunch of people on here. read many posts by you two, have not learn a thing worthy of my times reading them.

as they said, "be the front man, or shut the fu_k up"  

[8v10un30sun]

Yo, that's a total disc bro.

The correct term is PUT UP or SHUT UP.    I suggest you do just that if you think you are hot stuff.  So far you've demonstrated a strong ignorance to the concepts of proofs.  I think you are way over your head on this because you don't even understand that to prove equivalence you need a bi-diretional proof.   

8v and b-rod....you both don't seem to know enough about the subject yourself. merely stated what others have said does not proof anything. you're just confusing bunch of people on here. read many posts by you two, have not learn a thing worthy of my times reading them.

as they said, "be the front man, or shut the fu_k up"  

[b_rod]

8v and b-rod....you both don't seem to know enough about the subject yourself. merely stated what others have said does not proof anything. you're just confusing bunch of people on here. read many posts by you two, have not learn a thing worthy of my times reading them.

as they said, "be the front man, or shut the fu_k up"  

Told you that you were bullshiting. You don't even visit PF.com do you?

 

EVEN THERE...they use citations you retard! THEY LINK SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES TOO.

 

Why don't you talk to UCB professor and have him come on here to talk to us.

This is how stupid you are. You are not even qaulified to even talk about it. you have yet to even find a direct quote, and you still think you know more...

 

Let me guess, you want to debate with Michio Kaku too right? So that when he corrects you, you won't even understand what he is talking about.

Remember this bullshit:

E=MC^2 but for rigor you must prove and demonstrate M=E/C^2 as well of your proof to be complete. 

Where is the quote you LIED about with a physician stating what you stated again? Too embarrassed to post it again huh?

 


Seriously, you are a retard. You think you would even qualify to have a debate with a UC Professor? Michio Kaku? Stephen Hawking?

[8v10un30sun]

Sounds like you flaking out.

[b_rod]

8v and b-rod....you both don't seem to know enough about the subject yourself. merely stated what others have said does not proof anything.

BTW, I can tell you are full of shit because you stated the same crap the moron above did. You sure know more than I do.

Let me know when  you have visited PF.com. Let me know when you understand the fundamentals.

 

Let me guess, you are a theoretical physicists  .........?

If not, what the hell makes you think you are even qualified to talk about it? You are the same type of moron like 8v10un30sun. You make guess out of ignorance.

Feel free to post your degree and what field of science you majored in.

           

[b_rod]

Sounds like you flaking out.

 

Go to the thread, I am going to answer and blast you ass there.

 

WATCH!

[8v10un30sun]

BLAST ME.  Just remember to bring $5000 to the table.

[b_rod]

BLAST ME.  Just remember to bring $5000 to the table.

Don't worry bro, I have UC Professor, you have a guess from your own ignorance.

 

I also have UCB Science DEPARTMENT!

Yeah, the department you flabby chest...Big 10 my ass!

 

[HmonGuy]

 
what do i get from you for understanding mathematical concepts?

don't you think you're confusing mathematical proofs and scientific proofs?

i suppose you're still one of those that believe the shortest distance between two points is a straight line? 

that we cannot turn energy back into mass, due to time?
this debate is about Einstein's equation about mass into energy.....doe s it say anything about time?

hmmm....per thermodynamics concept, have anyone ever created a Carnot engine? 

Yo, that's a total disc bro.

The correct term is PUT UP or SHUT UP.    I suggest you do just that if you think you are hot stuff.  So far you've demonstrated a strong ignorance to the concepts of proofs.  I think you are way over your head on this because you don't even understand that to prove equivalence you need a bi-diretional proof.   

[HmonGuy]

because i do not agreed with your idols, now i'm an idiot too? 
you need to check the forum, you'll find me there...have not been there as much i should be for awhile though.

jumping onto this debate, i've never claimed to know more than either of 8v or you. i merely wanted to understand why so many pages already and yet i, and perhaps many in here, have not learn a thing about this topic. do you not notice that you both are going in circles? it has been demonstrated that neither of you have the skills nor knowledge to construct any experiment to prove your point, all you two are doing is just relying on what other people said.

all that you're going on about it is that your idols said so, and all 8v ever said is Einstein's equation is not "all correct"

Mathematics is a universal language, if you can walk forward then you should be able to walk backward. the problem maybe that we have not learn how to walk backward? 

BTW, I can tell you are full of shit because you stated the same crap the moron above did. You sure know more than I do.

Let me know when  you have visited PF.com. Let me know when you understand the fundamentals.

 

Let me guess, you are a theoretical physicists   .........?

If not, what the hell makes you think you are even qualified to talk about it? You are the same type of moron like 8v10un30sun. You make guess out of ignorance.

Feel free to post your degree and what field of science you majored in.

          

[b_rod]

because i do not agreed with your idols, now i'm an idiot too? 
you need to check the forum, you'll find me there...have not been there as much i should be for awhile though.

No, you don't understand what sources are used for you and you keep wanting to debate and talk about science, yet we and you are NOT even credible. That is why I keep sourcing. That is why you are an imbecile like 8v10un30sun. The dude is so dumb he thinks that a UC Professor will get on PH to debate about science.....as k 8v10un30sun if he is a theoretical physicist! How about just a scientist? How about a source?

 

8v10un30sun wanted to debate about e=mc^2, yet he doesn't even understand it and was making BS claims about "Head Physicians" saying it. Ask him to post his quote again!

 

jumping onto this debate, i've never claimed to know more than either of 8v or you. i merely wanted to understand why so many pages already and yet i, and perhaps many in here, have not learn a thing about this topic. do you not notice that you both are going in circles? it has been demonstrated that neither of you have the skills nor knowledge to construct any experiment to prove your point, all you two are doing is just relying on what other people said.

....Again, this is why I call BS about you claiming you know science. If you have read the the threads on here, you will see that 8v10un30sun FAILS to even post direct quotes from reputable sources. He only makes claims from ignorance.

 

"all you two are doing is just relying on what other people said"

Let me know when you understand what a source is used for.

all that you're going on about it is that your idols said so, and all 8v ever said is Einstein's equation is not "all correct"

 

WRONG again. Go through the threads, you lack critical thinking. He claims theories are guess and not proven. He thinks a Law is superior. He thinks a theory becomes a law in SCIENCE. Now ask him for a DIRECT SOURCE that states it.

Mathematics is a universal language, if you can walk forward then you should be able to walk backward. the problem maybe that we have not learn how to walk backward? 

?

Who ever said math was not important? There is a difference in the order of math and science. math is used in science, so I don't see where you are going with this.

BTW, Michio Kaku knows his math too. Let me know if you want to proof. ALL Theoretical Physicists do. "E=mc^2"



NOW you tell me what sources are used for.