This Dr. (of God) William Lane Craig

[Solemn Wind]

This Dr. (of God) William Lane Craig...is his arguments supposed to be taken seriously? I have the misfortune of viewing two of his videos and it makes me want to puke. Even a thinking 10 year-old can refute what William Lane Craig said satisfactorily .

I don't think even people like V8 will cheer that guy on because in every video, at least the two I viewed, the DG (Doctor of God) never fails to make an ass of himself.

[evil-in-deed]

his whole points were...

its true because it was written...

dont ask, just believe...

and...

all religion are in contradictory but this one is the right one because i believe it is...

and when combined together we get... nonthinking people... people who do as theyre told... like slaves...

[b_rod]

This Dr. (of God) William Lane Craig...is his arguments supposed to be taken seriously? I have the misfortune of viewing two of his videos and it makes me want to puke. Even a thinking 10 year-old can refute what William Lane Craig said satisfactorily .

I don't think even people like V8 will cheer that guy on because in every video, at least the two I viewed, the DG (Doctor of God) never fails to make an ass of himself.

Here is some info to explain his idiocy:

William Lane Craig (born August 23, 1949) is an American Evangelical Christian apologist, theologian, and philosopher known for his contributions to the philosophy of religion, historical Jesus studies, and the philosophy of time.

CITED: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lane_Craig

Notice the lack of any scientific fields of study?     He should let the scientist know when he has EVIDENCE of his God. So far, even his church has failed to do so.

I think you, Solemn Wind, are giving 8v10un30sun too much credit. He said this and believes it:

Idea -> Hypothesis -> Repeatable Test -> Theory -> Rigorous Proof -> Theorem -> Universally Accepted -> Law.  This is the chain of events.

He still has yet to even prove it. evil-in-deed and I are still waiting for the evidence to show that is the Scientific Method. We call him out and he runs and dodges the question.

 

8v10un30sun, believes the human body is composed of cracker and wine. 8v10un30sun also believes that EVOLUTION and SCIENCE, does NOT contradict the belief of his God of the Bible. SCIENCE and EVOLUTION are proof his God does not exist as the data contradict:

- age of the Universe/Earth...
- Life before Jesus-saurs (millions of years before)...
- humans came from EVOLUTION not God of the Bible....

MIT agrees with EVOLUTION, 8v10un30sun agrees with MIT, MIT is NOT wrong in 8v10un30sun's eyes.

 

[Siryou]

This Dr. (of God) William Lane Craig...is his arguments supposed to be taken seriously? I have the misfortune of viewing two of his videos and it makes me want to puke. Even a thinking 10 year-old can refute what William Lane Craig said satisfactorily .

I don't think even people like V8 will cheer that guy on because in every video, at least the two I viewed, the DG (Doctor of God) never fails to make an ass of himself.

It is okay to be ignorant if ur not ready to die like a christian, or be like a christian. It's your own freewill...

This Craig is my favorite debator and he has stomped Christopher Hitchens like nothing. The question is: Is there a God? As for hitchen, he went off topic by bringing Christian history on a topic about, "Is there a God?" Kind of stupid for Hitchens, huh! Lmao!

[Siryou]

Here is some info to explain his idiocy:

Notice the lack of any scientific fields of study?     He should let the scientist know when he has EVIDENCE of his God. So far, even his church has failed to do so.

I think you, Solemn Wind, are giving 8v10un30sun too much credit. He said this and believes it:

He still has yet to even prove it. evil-in-deed and I are still waiting for the evidence to show that is the Scientific Method. We call him out and he runs and dodges the question.

 

8v10un30sun, believes the human body is composed of cracker and wine. 8v10un30sun also believes that EVOLUTION and SCIENCE, does NOT contradict the belief of his God of the Bible. SCIENCE and EVOLUTION are proof his God does not exist as the data contradict:

- age of the Universe/Earth...
- Life before Jesus-saurs (millions of years before)...
- humans came from EVOLUTION not God of the Bible....

MIT agrees with EVOLUTION, 8v10un30sun agrees with MIT, MIT is NOT wrong in 8v10un30sun's eyes.

 

It doesn't matter about a scientist guy or a non scientist guy because the point is the logical reason and idea. It's all about philosophy, not about science to show off, lmao! 

[b_rod]

It doesn't matter about a scientist guy or a non scientist guy because the point is the logical reason and idea. It's all about philosophy, not about science to show off, lmao!

 

Spoken like a true Christian.

REJECT ALL FACTS TO TRY AND KEEP YOUR GOD ALIVE, STAY IGNORANT TO FACTS AND STAY AWAY FROM SCHOOL AND SCIENTIST.

 

Stay ignorant bro!

[Gracified23]

This rod dude believe that only things which can be tested scientifically is considered valid. Yet, that is not even a science question.
It is philosophical question, and Craig is well known philosopher today. So the question itself is self-refuting. Craig uses the same
arguments for many years in all his debates and no arguments disproving God have succeed.

[Solemn Wind]

This rod dude believe that only things which can be tested scientifically is considered valid. Yet, that is not even a science question.
It is philosophical question, and Craig is well known philosopher today. So the question itself is self-refuting. Craig uses the same
arguments for many years in all his debates and no arguments disproving God have succeed.

No arguments disaproving the Tooth Fairy have succeeded either.

[Gracified23]

No arguments disaproving the Tooth Fairy have succeeded either.

And what are the arguments? First, you can't even say because you have not looked
at all the evidence. Even if such fairy does exist, so what? I see no good reasons to believe in it.
And to suppose that God does not exist, how does that validate your position as an
atheist anyway? It cannot prove itself to be true, it must borrow the theist proofs.

[Solemn Wind]

And what are the arguments? First, you can't even say because you have not looked
at all the evidence. Even if such fairy does exist, so what? I see no good reasons to believe in it.
And to suppose that God does not exist, how does that validate your position as an
atheist anyway? It cannot prove itself to be true, it must borrow the theist proofs.

Hey hey hey, you adults have or are allow to have your God...don't deprive the millions of little kids in the world their Tooth Fairy. How could you or anyone say the Tooth Fairy is not important or does not exist when millions of children and even some adults believe in it?

[Gracified23]

Hey hey hey, you adults have or are allow to have your God...don't deprive the millions of little kids in the world their Tooth Fairy. How could you or anyone say the Tooth Fairy is not important or does not exist when millions of children and even some adults believe in it?

Where is your evidence for your own position? According to your own logic, if fairy exists then sure God also exists and that
Jesus rose from dead etc. Would you grant that? I'm not asking you to disprove God, i want you to validate your own position.

[Solemn Wind]

Where is your evidence for your own position? According to your own logic, if fairy exists then sure God also exists and that
Jesus rose from dead etc. Would you grant that? I'm not asking you to disprove God, i want you to validate your own position.

Hey, I didn't know you believe in the Tooth Fairy too.

[Gracified23]

Hey, I didn't know you believe in the Tooth Fairy too.

Is fairy a tenable position to hold to? Just because one believes in it doesn't make it true. So you'll
have to provide reasons/evidence to justify that belief. The burden of proof would be on you.

[Solemn Wind]

Is fairy a tenable position to hold to? Just because one believes in it doesn't make it true. So you'll
have to provide reasons/evidence to justify that belief. The burden of proof would be on you.

There's proof for the existence of God? Even a Christian God?

I think I'll step aside and let b_rod, our master debater, take over this debate.

[Gracified23]

There's proof for the existence of God? Even a Christian God?

I think I'll step aside and let b_rod, our master debater, take over this debate.

Without God you couldn't proof anything. The fact that you can prove something proves that you're wrong.
Wanna go with presupposition al? Any argument use against me will have to use laws logic. Please, how do you
account for the laws of logic in your worldview?