B- Rod

[Someone]

after Kicking their butt in Faith forum...you decided to kick their butt in the Debate forum 


  Let's Debate on which Forum B-Rod is going to go after them next on.....

[trepidpoda]

He kicked an invisible God's ass that doesn't exist.  Did he really!

[vangkm007]

His posts aren't organized in a way that makes them easy to read, plus all the random text colors bug me so I never read his stuff. lol

[Someone]

His posts aren't organized in a way that makes them easy to read, plus all the random text colors bug me so I never read his stuff. lol

  same here...but his flashy colors scare them away

[trepidpoda]

same here...but his flashy colors scare them away

That is because he hasn't provided his "scientific source" as to how the scientific method disproved why God doesn't exist.  After that, people stop arguing with him.

The flashy colors and big letters already indicate he is taking something very potent! 

[wadupgee]

When you can type little, make sense, kick azz, you make noise.

When you post up a book with 90% of what you put up are colorful stuff from someone else writing that no one would even look at, you then are a fisherman.  Nice flashy bait but no catch of the day.  LOL

[evil-in-deed]

brod posts some interesting links and vids... always fun to watch...

i have a method of proving if god exist or not... do i have any volunteers?...

[Solemn Wind]

brod posts some interesting links and vids... always fun to watch...

i have a method of proving if god exist or not... do i have any volunteers?...

Wait a minute. I thought b_rod was God? Well either way, no one can prove b_rod is not God.

[trepidpoda]

Wait a minute. I thought b_rod was God? Well either way, no one can prove b_rod is not God.

B_rod already proved he is not God.

Premise:

a) God does not exist
b) As a result there is no God
C) Therefore B_rod is not God, because God does not exist

My premise:

a) b_rod is demented
b) because demented/schizo people talks, fights, and kicks in thing air at things that doesn't exist
C) God doesn't exist, yet he talks, fights, and is against something that doesn't exist
D) Therefore b_rod is demented and schizo
E) Because only schizo and demented individuals talk day in and day out about something that doesn't exist
F) 

[evil-in-deed]

Wait a minute. I thought b_rod was God? Well either way, no one can prove b_rod is not God.

well in the method the religious uses... if it cannot be proven that brod is not god... then therefore brod is god... lolz...

B_rod already proved he is not God.

Premise:

a) God does not exist
b) As a result there is no God
C) Therefore B_rod is not God, because God does not exist

My premise:

a) b_rod is demented
b) because demented/schizo people talks, fights, and kicks in thing air at things that doesn't exist
C) God doesn't exist, yet he talks, fights, and is against something that doesn't exist
D) Therefore b_rod is demented and schizo
E) Because only schizo and demented individuals talk day in and day out about something that doesn't exist
F) 

so does a god not exist?...

[trepidpoda]

well in the method the religious uses... if it cannot be proven that brod is not god... then therefore brod is god... lolz...

so does a god not exist?...

Here is the proof by contradictory logic: It has been proven by logical philosophy that;

1) God doesn't have a condition because God doesn't exist
2) r_bob is not God because God have no condition
3) Because an "idiot" is a condition that describes R_bob
4) concludes that r_bod is not God, because God is not an idiot
5) That is enough proof here to be scientific

God doesn't exist is your claim in which you base your argument.  By contradiction it "disproves" you.

[evil-in-deed]

Here is the proof by contradictory logic: It has been proven by logical philosophy that;

1) God doesn't have a condition because God doesn't exist
2) r_bob is not God because God have no condition
3) Because an "idiot" is a condition that describes R_bob
4) concludes that r_bod is not God, because God is not an idiot
5) That is enough proof here to be scientific

God doesn't exist is your claim in which you base your argument.  By contradiction it "disproves" you.

a nongod exist is more accurate?... sure...

by contradiction it disproves itself... also sure...

1... god exist...
2... god contradicts itself...
3... contradictions disproves itself...
4... god disproves itself...
5... god doesnt exist...
6... your logic is consider scientific to you...
7... my logic is no different than yours...
8... my logic is consider scientific to you...
9... this is scientific...
10... a big fat... hen...

[trepidpoda]

a nongod exist is more accurate?... sure...

by contradiction it disproves itself... also sure...

1... god exist...
2... god contradicts itself...
3... contradictions disproves itself...
4... god disproves itself...
5... god doesnt exist...
6... your logic is consider scientific to you...
7... my logic is no different than yours...
8... my logic is consider scientific to you...
9... this is scientific...
10... a big fat... hen...

You make absolutely no sense.  You need a course in deductive reasoning where you can logically compose a premise and contradiction.  You are making statements that contradicts and disproves yourself.

How can you premise that:
 1) God exist
  and, 5) God doesn't exist
How is this possible for God to exist and at the same time doesn't exist?

2) God contradicts itself.....3) contradictions disproves itself....
With this statement, you are saying there is a contradiction within a contradiction that "disproves" itself....so this VOIDS the contradiction.  What a dummy!!!

your logic is not considered scientific at all.....hehe, you make no sense.
7) "my logic is no different than yours".......IT IS QUITE DIFFERENT from mine, you already proved yourself wrong as we know both our arguments are quite different. 

[8v10un30sun]

I guess that's one way of interpretting it 

Somone, I hope you can forgive us.  I know some of your family might have cast the stones at you, but they are ignorant.  I know you changed back to the old ways because that fits your life more and people are upset.  You know it's okay if you wish to go back to the old ways.  In fact, in catholicism, they allow ancestral worship as long as you hold God above all.  Hence, when they pray to Holy Mother Mary that is similar to ancestral worship.  Yeah, I know protestants especially conservative ones would argue that is wrong too but who the flip knows how to correctly interpret the scripture right?  At the end of the day, it's still up to God to judge using His infinite wisdom and grace.

I hope you will read Matthew 7 when you have time.

 
after Kicking their butt in Faith forum...you decided to kick their butt in the Debate forum 


  Let's Debate on which Forum B-Rod is going to go after them next on.....

[Someone]

I guess that's one way of interpretting it 

Somone, I hope you can forgive us.  I know some of your family might have cast the stones at you, but they are ignorant.  I know you changed back to the old ways because that fits your life more and people are upset.  You know it's okay if you wish to go back to the old ways.  In fact, in catholicism, they allow ancestral worship as long as you hold God above all.  Hence, when they pray to Holy Mother Mary that is similar to ancestral worship.  Yeah, I know protestants especially conservative ones would argue that is wrong too but who the flip knows how to correctly interpret the scripture right?  At the end of the day, it's still up to God to judge using His infinite wisdom and grace.

I hope you will read Matthew 7 when you have time.

yup Sun it's been pure fun, but why is religion in here now LOL