Quit The Fronting...

[8v10un30sun]

What happens on PH stays on PH.

Thank you!

[wadupgee]

What I like to say is what happens in PH never happens.  LOL

[b_rod]

Quit The Fronting...

Tell me about it. When you make such claims as:

Idea -> Hypothesis -> Repeatable Test -> Theory -> Rigorous Proof -> Theorem -> Universally Accepted -> Law.  This is the chain of events.

This and can't even cite a source to back you up!

 

Here is my proof 8v10un30sun is wrong:

A Theory NEVER becomes a Scientific Law...

"Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law"

Many people learned in elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses."No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature. So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are not expressing reservations about its truth.


CITED: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-creationist

A Theorem does NOT belong in the Scientific Method and NEVER comes from/becomes a theory or Scientific Law...

Theorems are what mathematics is all about. A theorem is a statement which has been proved true by a special kind of logical argument called a rigorous proof.

CITED: http://www.esotericka.org/cmc/tth.html

Sam Nelson: I completed my Ph.D. at Louisiana State University in August 2002 and then spent seven years as a visiting assistant professor -- two years at Whittier College, three years at the University of California at Riverside, one year at Pomona College, and one year as a visitor at Claremont McKenna College before switching to tenure-track status at CMC.

So where is your proof?

 

 

You are too funny and a FRAUD. Let me know when you can post a source. Even post a definition, and watch me use that Dictionary to turn it around on you.

 

Even your Buddy disagrees with you: (notice the Theory NEVER goes to Law? Notice the lack of a Theorem)

1) hypothesis---> theory, or Law; is proved by the scientific method because that is what the scientific method is.   r_bod didn't know this.  And after the sources I gave him, still begs the question.  THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD proves: hypothesis ---> theory, or Law.   So the source he is asking for is the Scientific Method.

 

[8v10un30sun]

For the chump who has never studied science and worked in the scientific field, here is a perfect example of how a THEORY BECOMES A LAW.

Before there was Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation Law, there was Newton's Theory of Universal Gravitiation"

Here's a history of how Newton came up with his theory and proved it.

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sgravity.htm

Here is what we call it today.

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newtongrav.html

Just say it again...I'm right and you are wrong.

Fg=m1*m2/r^2 (Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation)

Quit The Fronting...

Tell me about it. When you make such claims as:

This and can't even cite a source to back you up!

 

Here is my proof 8v10un30sun is wrong:

A Theory NEVER becomes a Scientific Law...

A Theorem does NOT belong in the Scientific Method and NEVER comes from/becomes a theory or Scientific Law...

Sam Nelson: I completed my Ph.D. at Louisiana State University in August 2002 and then spent seven years as a visiting assistant professor -- two years at Whittier College, three years at the University of California at Riverside, one year at Pomona College, and one year as a visitor at Claremont McKenna College before switching to tenure-track status at CMC.

So where is your proof?

 

 

You are too funny and a FRAUD. Let me know when you can post a source. Even post a definition, and watch me use that Dictionary to turn it around on you.

 

Even your Buddy disagrees with you: (notice the Theory NEVER goes to Law? Notice the lack of a Theorem)

 

Btw you are so stupid.  Math is the language of science.  All theorems are applicable to science and used by scientist.

[trepidpoda]

8......

That was a lethal blow to r-bob.  TKO!! hahaha 

1) methoa10 aka r-bob.......learn not to put words in other people's mouth.  That is a NO NO and not nice!!  I never said I disagreed with 8...
2) you shown an article of how EVOLUTION, which is a theory (not proven) will never be LAW.  That means it disproves you and your hawkins and kaku.  Hahaha.  You killed yourself here.   Yet you make claims like "evolution proved God wrong" when it has not even been proven....it is just a theory.
3) It is proof that you never passed 6th grade Earth science, because you don't even understand the Scientific method.  
   a) You didn't know that in the Scientific method; theory (is a hypothesis passed a few test, lets say 50% as a number of testing it went through); a Law is also a hypothesis that has been rigorously passed without being disproved yet, lets say 99%/arbitrary).  In the scientific method; a law is not tested in all environments at once......it is test in a few first, found to be valid...then tested, and tested, and tested....unti l it is almost solid...then becomes law.  That transition.... it first is a hypothesis, and after passed a few test....techni cally is a Thoery....unti l....99% testing is conducted...no t yet disproved..... .then it becomes law.   There is no way to test a hyothesis into law all at once (you are saying 99% testing done at once to go into Law?...Not possible). Since you haven't passed the 6th grade, you can ask your teahcer this.
   b) we are talking apple......you talk orange.  We talk about theory as in the Scientific procedure..... as in the scientific method.  You talk orange.....in the definition of what makes a theory a theory....what makes a law, a law.  Which no body argues here about and already knows that a theory is NOT a Law by definition.   Get on the same page here.  You don't even know what we are talking about here.  You proclaimed an orange when we talk apples.  
4) NOBODY READS ANYTHING YOU WRITE ON HERE BECAUSE YOU MAKE ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE!!  wHAT A WASTE.  Nobody cares what you write on here and nobody reads it.