The US government strictly enforces immunization because we are prone to viruses, but aren't side effects something to take into consideration instead? Some researchers and many parents link immunizations (because they contain mercury, animal parts, etc) to autism or sudden infant death. Do you think that these people are just being delusional and that they only want to find another source to blame other than themselves?
There has been claims without hard evidence that immunizations cause these severe side effects; mental retardation, autism, even allergies, etc. Most side effects are mild and nonlife threatening. In 1 to 2% of the cases, immunizations can cause severe life threatinng side effects, and rarely death.
However, in medicine, we weigh the benefits of immunization against the risk of it. In the past, hundreds of thousands of infants, children, people died of small pox, pertusis, measles, rubella, diptheria, etc, etc.....in comparision to only a few thousands of adverse side effects, and only a handful of deaths with immunization. Do we say don't vaccinate because of the side effects, and hundreds of thousands more people continue to die each year from an endemic (way more if epidemic)? Or, do we risk the handful of deaths of vaccination? What do will you pick? Without vaccinations..
..millions will die across the globe. The benefits out weigh the risks.
The reason why there are side effects are because of the human body and how it reacts to the toxiod of the vaccine, and can react severely. The components of the conjugate is to make sure the vital parts of the vaccine is preserved....o
r else it won't work. Many times the bad stuff along with the vaccine is what is needed to keep the vaccine working, remove that constituent, and the vaccine becomes inert. However, medicine is finding newer and safer conjugate to make vaccines out of. Nevertheless, can never bypass the allergic reaction of the virus particle itself.