Patterson Film (Big Foot) Real or Hoax?

[chingy-vang]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N96o-Qohnps

Evidence For: leg muscles can be seen moving as the creature walks, so it cant be a costume. If it was a costume, then it would have had to fit very tightly on the skin like basically glued on, and the man would have had to wear the costume naked. Ape costumes back in the 1960s didnt have elastic suit. They were very stiff like leather and it wasnt until the 80s that the first elastic Ape costumes were made for use in Planet of the Apes.



Evidence Against: The Big Foot's left under foot can be seen multiple times but why no toes were visible when fingers and fine hair are clearly visible? Also Patterson's cast of the foot prints had toes but the in the video, the big foot had no toes. Also, an Ape's feet is different from Man's






and then there are many articles debunking and even the man claiming to be in the costume came out and told the truth. This article is pretty interesting on debunking the Patterson Film - http://xzonenation.blogspot.com/2006/11/exposing-roger-pattersons-1967-bigfoot.html

[Hung_Low]

Go ask all Evolutionists. .. they all believe in it and they believe UFOs exist too.  If they deny it, they're telling you that evolution don't exist.

[chingy-vang]

lol just because Bigfoot is half Man half ape doesn't mean All evolutionists believe in mythical creatures

[azn-guy]

this is the only thing that came close to bigfoot evidence, every other evidence they have up till now is just plain fake but in my opinion i think its fake. If they would of found bigfoot they would of found it by now

[chingy-vang]

But Bigfoot have existed in Native American culture way before that film. Gorilla skeletons have never been found in the wild. We even got some Hmong folks with stories, just look in the Ghost stories thread lol

[azn-guy]

either there extinct or never existed at all anyone could tell stories and said it was true but i dont mess with around with those hmong ghost stories i tend to stay away from them heard one to many stories LOL

[realism]

this is one of those that you have to see to believe

[Sentinel_Li]

The animal was walking in the "creek sand" and is possible that mud and sand has covered his foot and toes to look like that on film.  Try walking in the mud/sand....you will get a layer of gunk on your foot.  Notice how the material on his foot also look similar to the color and consistency of the material/sand and mud on the ground.

Saying you can't see toes on the film is not consistent with what it was walking on.   If it was hard dirt or grassy plain, then you can use that argument.

[fareastlee]

This film is fake but I'm not saying bigfoot is fake though. They have to be real cause everyone around the world has a story about them even our parents.

[Hung_Low]

This film is fake but I'm not saying bigfoot is fake though. They have to be real cause everyone around the world has a story about them even our parents.

If they are real, we must capture some and trained them to be spy for the U.S. cause they sure can hide without no one finding any evidence.

[fareastlee]

If they are real, we must capture some and trained them to be spy for the U.S. cause they sure can hide without no one finding any evidence.

If god is real then bigfoot gotta be real too right??