No, it wasn't. USA was already involved pre-1962. Like I stated earlier, USA supported the French re-colonization of Indochina as soon as the 1954 split of Vietnam at the 17th parallel. I know you're going to come up with some sensational bullshit excuse for this now too.
And like i said and will quote again,
"All the political actions prior to the Geneva convention of 1962 was residual from the french and vietnamese war, NOT the american and vietnamese war." That includes the americans, the french and your dog-eating regime.
The whole reason for the Geneva 'Agreement' of 1962 was to establish clear political status so all parties could stop acting with impunity. All parties including americans, french and your dog-eating regime. That is why your dog-eating regime went to Geneva, assembled, convened and agreed upon the Geneva 'Agreement' of 1962. Are you denying that they put their signature on the Geneva 'Agreement' of 1962? Are you denying that they agreed upon the political status of laos from 1962 onwards as a sovereign state, indepedent and neutral?
This all goes back to the fact that the "Secret War" was directly used to fight the Vietnamese forces, NOT to defend the land Hmong were living in. We numbered over 400,000 and yet, only 10,000-30,000 actually fought. Ok, so if we truly were fighting Vietnamese on our own homefront, Hmong soldiers would've been up in arms over 200,000 strong of teenage boys and men. Wonder what exaggerated excuse you'll have for this. "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but!"
Death figures from WWII, which was a much larger, much more important war:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualtiesGermany:
Population at WWII - 69,300,000
Military deaths - 4,400,000
percentage of population - 6.3%
USA:
Population at WWII - 131,028,000
Military deaths - 416,800
percentage of poppulation - 0.32%
Britain:
Population at WWII - 47,760,000
Military deaths - 383,800
percentage of poppulation - 0.8%
France:
Population at WWII - 41,700,000
Military deaths - 217,600
percentage of poppulation - 0.52%
Italy:
Population at WWII - 44,394,000
Military deaths - 301,400
percentage of poppulation - 0.68%
Soviet Union:
Population at WWII - 168,524,000
Military deaths - 14,000,000
percentage of poppulation - 8.3%
--------------------------------------------
Hmong (taking upper-end figures)
Population - 400,000
Military deaths - 30,000
percentage of poppulation - 7.5%
Sensational claim by dog-eating vietminh sympathizer and apologist: check
Propaganda based on NO scientific metric to leverage the degree of a nation's 'defensive' posture: check
Hilarious, amateurish and entertaining: check
And so what? I'm not pro-Vietnam or pro-Laos. Stop explaining it to me as if I'm trying to justify or sugar coat Vietnam's continued installment of forces in Laos throughout the Indochina War. I said it myself: they broke the shit. I would've too to win the war. Would you? Oh, you would play fair? STFU. You think USA is playing it fair by the book in the Middle East? You're so out of touch with reality...
I'm fully 100% certain that a jury, given a transcript of this thread, would laugh at your claim of "I'm not pro-Vietnam".