0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
oh no, this again.. So you are implying that being gay is a natural thing and not a choice eh? So what did your science say about the gay gene? No conclusion with the gay gene and the studies that you are probably watching were done on gay twins and men. Where is the love for gay twin women? So is there a straight gene then? Well straight gene is by natural for the survival of such species so you do not have to look for it. If it is not genetically related or you were born gay that way then what else can it be? A choice? This is how I see this. A big bio mass of bacteria growing in a petri dish. You got so many in there that most will propagate as society's norm and then we have homo in the corner trying to propagate but nothing happens. The ones that are able to propagate will carry their genes to the next generations. The misfits that can't will die off but does that mean that the gay genes will die off since the forefathers of the gay genes can not propagate? Science and logic, it makes you think and it can make you stupid.
Is that what you really want to argue? When I prove you wrong, we all know what you are going to do; you're going to pick at straws and argue something else.
I don't argue. I just flow with the flow but with backup substances.
I can tell this is already going to be like the title of the thread....1. "Argue" in the sense of a debate. It's silly that you didn't understand that.2. Refer to #6. 3. You have no substance, just assumptions.
Your opinion smells fruity like my opinions too.
Refer to #9.
post #1 is still your opinion ha refer to that as well
good. see you and your opinionated thread in another year. Keep bumping old dead skin cells up for a good laughing matter
