Don't be patronizing. This whole situation of sexual exploitation is not the same as relatives sending money overseas to sustain a comfortable life. The money used in exploitation isn't setting up work income and work experience opportunities and the money simply goes to those who are willing to used their daughters in such way or those who are conniving enough to manipulate men. It's quite disgusting when Hmong-Americans say that they rely on "us". Who's us? How many of you are sending money overseas on a regular basis?
... kekeke ...
Granted the
HA'Mung may not be the majority of "
us" but without a doubt
Hmong-Americans are the "
us" most if not
ALL Hmong SEAsians look to, depend upon, and seek out economic patronage from ... KEKEKE ...
(But no one, especially a/the
HA'Mung would know, comprehend, and avow such a no nonsense and practicality of and about "
us" ... kekeke ...
)
$Hint$: "
us" are the ONLY folks, aka "
us", for the past 40+years to date in the USA who would care to buy anything from them (overseas) like their handycrafts, embroideries, herbal meds, music videos/albums etc. and would even care to sponsor them (the few notable artists) to perform (concerts) here in the
USA. Without "
us" they have practically NO market ($cashflow$) in the "
USA" to their overseas pockets ... KEKEKE ...
DOLT! ... kekeke ...