I prefer developing film and print in old fashion way because it's more fun and interesting to see how the negative film and print turn out.
Yes, if you're doing film for art pieces. But, I use these quick printers for every day things or events at my kids school, day at the pool, day at a park, etc. I don't want a film camera for these things. It's too costly for the film and for developing, being that there are limited places that will still print film. The last time I printed film (about 3 to 4 years ago), I didn't have a good experience with the developer. It was one reason why I went further into the digital world. Another thing was it cost about $20 for 12 decent photos with 6 of them were good...really? And, there was no way to tell which photo would be good. With an at home printer, I can choose to print two or three I like, and with digital prints from say, Walgreens, I can see what I want printed before I print + I can get like 100 photos for $10 or less during sales, and that's 100 photos I really like. Btw, I give photos away too so when I printed film, I could barely give any away 'cause it cost too much but now I do it a lot.
