Advertisement

Author Topic: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth  (Read 6174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fOrEvEr_sUn_76

  • Guest
Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« on: October 22, 2015, 07:33:00 PM »
If in case you haven't already seen this in the Anonymous forum via that other post, here's the same story re-post here.

A 37-year-old Hatley man was charged with 14 counts Friday after an investigation into methamphetamin e and marijuana trafficking.

Pao Yang remains in the Marathon County jail on a $125,000 cash bond.

According to a news release from the Marathon County Sheriff's Department, a traffic stop led to a search warrant of a residence at 3800 block of County Road N, in the Township of Plover which resulted in the seizure of approximately two ounces of high grade crystal methamphetamin e and several ounces of processed marijuana. Prior to the the traffic stop court documents show Yang sold nearly $300 worth of meth to a confidential informant.

Investigators said the estimated street value of the drugs seized in the investigation exceeded $4,000. The amount of currency seized was approximately $5,000.

Investigators said Yang is on probation and was found in possession of three firearms including a handgun equipped with a silencer.

Yang will return to court Oct. 14. That's when he's expected to learn if his case will head to trial.



For the original article, go here:

http://www.wsaw.com/home/headlines/Wausau-man-arrested-suspected-of-trafficking-meth-331275062.html?device=phone


Pao Yang, meth trafficking suspect


Look at all he earn



Like this post: 0

Adverstisement

JMuah

  • Guest
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2015, 06:45:48 PM »
Why the COPS always busting the small timers only.



Like this post: 0

Offline Solemn Wind

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 22111
  • Respect: +59
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2015, 07:08:55 PM »
Why the COPS always busting the small timers only.

Because the big timers are off limit.



Like this post: 0

Offline dogmai

  • Jr. Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 2846
  • Respect: +87
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2015, 05:05:09 AM »
Why the COPS always busting the small timers only.

Because small timers talk.



Like this post: 0

Offline joot

  • Jr. Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1641
  • Lonewolf & Cub
  • Respect: +80
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2015, 11:15:03 AM »
Because if they caught the big timers, their own supply will be in jeopardy...I'm sure some of the judges, lawyers, cops are using it too...they are protecting the big timers...



Like this post: 0

Offline Solemn Wind

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 22111
  • Respect: +59
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2015, 04:02:25 PM »
Because if they caught the big timers, their own supply will be in jeopardy...I'm sure some of the judges, lawyers, cops are using it too...they are protecting the big timers...

The irony of it all is that some of those big time powerful politcians (U.S. Senators, Representative s, etc.) and the big time drug dealers are actually friends or in business together or both.


« Last Edit: October 25, 2015, 04:08:07 PM by Solemn Wind »

Like this post: 0

Offline joot

  • Jr. Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1641
  • Lonewolf & Cub
  • Respect: +80
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2015, 06:53:50 PM »
The irony of it all is that some of those big time powerful politcians (U.S. Senators, Representative s, etc.) and the big time drug dealers are actually friends or in business together or both.

My point exactly......



Like this post: 0

Lyn Song

  • Guest
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2015, 03:06:27 PM »
Why do people turn to doing this, they know they'll get caught sooner or later. ???



Like this post: 0

JMuah

  • Guest
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2015, 11:24:26 AM »
Why do people turn to doing this, they know they'll get caught sooner or later. ???

Do you know how the Kennedy family obtain their wealth?

Yes, selling boozes during the prohibition era.

How about the Bush....

Wasn't George Sr. the head of the CIA when our parents where in Laos farming the opium field?

Hmm.... More then meets the eyes! Auto-bot (sheepeople) roll out.  :police: :idiot2: :knuppel2: 



Like this post: 0

Lyn Song

  • Guest
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2015, 04:04:14 PM »
Do you know how the Kennedy family obtain their wealth?

Yes, selling boozes during the prohibition era.

How about the Bush....

Wasn't George Sr. the head of the CIA when our parents where in Laos farming the opium field?

Hmm.... More then meets the eyes! Auto-bot (sheepeople) roll out.  :police: :idiot2: :knuppel2:

Sorry Lyn doesn't know much about any of those people. :-[



Like this post: 0

nnnyang

  • Guest
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2015, 10:35:03 PM »
they'd be out of the job if they got the big timers.  small timers to give them fun and a job.



Like this post: 0

Offline thePoster

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17533
  • Respect: +299
    • View Profile
Re: Hatley man in custody, suspected of trafficking meth
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2015, 10:08:12 AM »
That doesn't really look like a lot of money, I believe I walked around with about that amount in cash with me before when I went to buy a car



Like this post: 0
I went through all 15k posts and those 2 quotes I found were the only ones so I guess that would make it "everytime".  Feel free to go through all 15k posts and verify by quoting them all.  You need to quote them all to verifying prove "everytime".   Please verify that Im wrong.

 

Advertisements