where is god?

[bulbasaur]

*yawns*

See above.  Compare your argument against mine.  Same claim, but your argument is trash. 

And we agreed that we are having a "basic logic and debate"?  Don't recall anyone saying so.

When people play a game.  They agree to play the game.  We never agreed to such a thing.  Therefore, no game to begin with.
You were the one who all of a sudden decided, oh yes, we're debating.  Oh and we play by these rules because I said so.   

And you can throw in whatever rules you want, it doesn't mean he's the victor.
Even  by your accounts, he loss.  If you do play by those rules, they go to everyone, not just one person. Kind of ironic how you only apply the rules to one side.

[hmgROCK]

If you don't believe he exists, how do you know if he does such a thing?
How do you asks why he isn't doing something if you don't even believe he exists in the first place?

Or are you now declaring that you believe God does exist?

You keep posing questions and not answers.

you know why i know he isn't doing anything





it's all over the internet if you wanna look at more picture

[hmgROCK]

*yawns*

See thread. Your need to make up imaginary rules in a non-agreed upon "debate" is bitter garbage.

How do you know if you don't believe he exist?

Remember what I initially said.  Do you want to have a discussion or are you just trying to mock theism. Cause you're not trying to have a discussion as seen by you ignoring questions and posts.  All you do is pose questions and posts claims to mock God.

i am not mocking anything, bro
i don't curse or swear
my paragraph only consist of short 4-5 sentence

Where is god?
why are these stuff going unnoticed by him?
it's 5 years now into the war
don't you think he would have noticed

god is absence

[bulbasaur]

Not really rules.  It's logic.  If you are contradicting yourself, you are illogical.  If you don't actually defend your beliefs, that's illogical.  At no point in your argument did you defend God or your beliefs.  But look, I did it for you.  You're welcome.   

Your need to make up imaginary rules in a non-agreed upon "debate" is bitter garbage.

How do you know if you don't believe he exist?

Remember what I initially said.  Do you want to have a discussion or are you just trying to mock theism. Cause you're not trying to have a discussion as seen by you ignoring questions and posts.  All you do is pose questions and posts claims to mock God.

[hmgROCK]

So. Do you want a discussion?  Cause I answered your other question but you ignored mine.
I'll ask another one.

If you believe God doesn't exist,  How can you blame such things on him or question why he didn't do anything?

Is this just a thread for you to rant about god.  If so.  Go on ahead.  I'll leave you be and let you rant about god.  But if you want to have a discussion.  Have the discussion rather than posing questions and ignoring what someone else says.

So what do you want.  A discussion or a place to rant about god? Yea it's another question, but what do you want out of this.

my relatives lives in the farm
if one of the animal start going crazy and killing other animal
he would go ahead and kill that animal or sperate it from the other animal
he noticed and step in and fix the problem

we are god children, right?

after looking at those photographic proof, i think it is a good time to step in

[bulbasaur]

Damn kid, there are logic rules.  Stop getting hung up on semantics.  That is why you don't see the problem with your "Guns don't kill" argument.  Go look up logic rules.  Go educate yourself.  You're still young and in school, so take advantage that. 

And if you are too lazy to educate yourself, do you really believe your argument is better than mine?  We argued the same thing, but which is better? 

I said from the start that you may not learn, and it's apparently true.

You said they were rules.  Now you're saying they aren't really rules, instead they are logic.

And uh thanks, I guess.

[hmgROCK]

I am God's child.  And so are others.
I don't know if you are.  Not saying I don't believe you are. I believe you are too.

But you don't believe he exists.  Which begs to question, how can you be his child if you believe he doesn't exist.

i am my parent's child
i was born from thousand of other sperm (dad) trying to reach the egg(mom)
out of all those sperm, i was the fastest swimmer

you should read the "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep" verse
sheep are being killed by other sheep
where is the shepherd?
why isn't he keeping an eye on his flock
why is it going unnoticed by the shepherd

[bulbasaur]

*yawns*

Reading comprehension is important.  You just mad that you are losing a debate to hmgrock. 

Between the all of us, you are the most inconsistent.  Heck, you are outright contradicting yourself.  You are confusing yourself with semantics. 

So now you resort to calling someone a kid and lazy.  Isn't it always said that you lose when you resort to such tactics?

You just said they aren't really rules, they are logic.
Now you're saying they are logic rules. Wouldn't have to argue semantics if you were consistent.

Funny how you keep changing how you define what they are.
One post they are rules.  One post they are logic. One they are both.

Go look up consistency. As bad as you claim my argument to be, atleast I stuck by it.  I'm consistently bad. ha.
I didn't make up rules and change definitions on the fly.

[hmgROCK]

you are your parent's child (which I don't doubt).
Are you denying being God's child?
Because you asked "we are god children, right?"

according to your belief
we are all gods child
if your child is misbehaving badly won't you step in?

imma put it in simpy wording so everyone can understand
i don't believe in god
because we have yet to see this dude
other than, believe....., just believe

[FetishDream]

according to your belief
we are all gods child
if your child is misbehaving badly won't you step in?

imma put it in simpy wording so everyone can understand
i don't believe in god
because we have yet to see this dude
other than, believe....., just believe

How old are you now? 

You are your parent's child and if you misbehave now, wouldn't your parents step on in?

The answer is absolutely not.  Why?   

[bulbasaur]

You want to talk about consistency.  Well, look in the mirror...

You wrote, "Did I say science kill? Nope."
And you wrote, "Science caused this."

You are so caught up with everyone and everything else, you fail to realize how awful your argument is.  You are so confused on what logic is, and you rather argue that.  Are there rules or aren't there rules?  Are there debate rules or aren't there debate rules?  Does logic have rules or not?  In the end, if you don't want to follow the rules of logic or debate, then fine.  However, don't delude yourself that you made a sensible argument. 

And you shouldn't worry too much about being illogical.  A study has shown that a good portion of the population lack basic logic.  You at least have company. 

So now you resort to calling someone a kid and lazy.  Isn't it always said that you lose when you resort to such tactics?

You just said they aren't really rules, they are logic.
Now you're saying they are logic rules. Wouldn't have to argue semantics if you were consistent.

Funny how you keep changing how you define what they are.
One post they are rules.  One post they are logic. One they are both.

Go look up consistency. As bad as you claim my argument to be, atleast I stuck by it.  I'm consistently bad. ha.
I didn't make up rules and change definitions on the fly.