The premise on climate change is that it is based upon scientific models and a lot of literature have been published. I once had a discussion with a PhD, a few of them on different occasions and I said I don't believe in global warming and the predicted impact. I said I believe climates do change as we've seen in history, ice age etc... I said humans do impact the climate. What I am holding judgement on is what is the impact given we know so little about the Earth's atmospheres. What I mean by that is someone can describe a car and it parts and know the fuel is going to end but the said mechanic is not the engineers who designed and built the car. The engineers understand the trade-offs in the design and the engineers designed with a purpose. The mechanic doesn't know these things because the mechanic simply lacks the intimate knowledge. Modern science today in my opinion is at the mechanic level. If it was higher at the engineer level, man would be terra forming Mars and engineering the atmosphere of Mars to be livable. A lot of people disagree with what I say because it's not science they are talking about, it's dogmatic institution. This type of critical thinking or group think reminds me of the persecution of Galileo. As you see in these videos, most of the naysayers are retired scientists whom in their final years are expressing their true belief because the neoliberals are fascist.