Advertisement

Author Topic: Supreme Court Favors Baker In Refusal To Same Sex  (Read 4767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

can

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court Favors Baker In Refusal To Same Sex
« Reply #15 on: June 22, 2018, 01:11:42 PM »
How do someone decide religious freedom (freedom of speech) vs. discrimination?  Freedom of speech or is this a case of discrimination?  Where do freedom of speech ends and discrimination start?  The supreme court ruled 7-2 in favor of freedom of speech over discrimination .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CVXNLzZxRM

you do realize what freedom of speech is right?

You don't have that right when your service is being provided to the open public.

 O0



Like this post: 0

Adverstisement

Renaissance

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court Favors Baker In Refusal To Same Sex
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2018, 11:03:08 AM »
This is a case of balancing "religious liberties" and "civil rights."  How do you uphold one right without infringing on the other?  I believe the court got this one right. O0



Like this post: 0

Offline Believe_N_Me

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 14023
  • Respect: +454
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Favors Baker In Refusal To Same Sex
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2018, 05:01:25 AM »
ROFL! Ph Libtards wracking their brain over the ruling...

....you're all wrong. The reason why the supreme court ruled in favor of the baker is because the Colorado courts discriminated against him. There was already a previous Colorado case in which the court sided with a baker who refused to write a Christian verse that was played up to denounce homosexuality. If the courts are going to allow that baker to refuse a 'custom' cake then they should allow Jack Phillips to opt out of baking a customized cake.

Customers do not have rights to a 'customized' product. Business owners do not have to produce a "customized" item if it expresses a message that violates their deeply held beliefs. That includes secularists who don't want to customize a message that says "atheists should die". In fact, business owners do not have to produce any customization that would misrepresent their brand.

 "Customization" is the operative word here. Wedding cakes are always "customized". They also express a message and that's why they are called "wedding" cakes. Masterpiece Cakeshop reserves their right not to bake a customized wedding cake that would express any marriage outside of a heterosexual union.



Like this post: 0

Offline Believe_N_Me

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 14023
  • Respect: +454
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Favors Baker In Refusal To Same Sex
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2018, 04:19:04 AM »
Here's the thing Libtards, it is not the court to decide what is popular and unpopular speech/expression. The Supreme Court basically affirmed that Colorado courts was biased against Christian beliefs when they discriminated against Jack Phillips. It is not up to the CC to find Christian beliefs invalid or hateful.



Like this post: 0

 

Advertisements