Advertisement

Author Topic: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer  (Read 633 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline w1s3m0n

  • PH Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 912
  • Respect: +77
    • View Profile
NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« on: January 13, 2020, 07:48:42 PM »
For all of us traders.  NK just announce on Bloomberg they have a full response (pretty much cure) many types of cancer using antigen and immunotherapy.

NOTE: This is a time-sensitive announcement.  Do not be a fish and chase.



Like this post: 0

Adverstisement

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2020, 01:26:02 PM »
no thankz

pump and dump
where is the FDA drug treatment approval???
just whisper in the wind

plus BERNIE SANDER single payer healthcare will bankrupty lots of healthcare companies TO THE GROUND



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline w1s3m0n

  • PH Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 912
  • Respect: +77
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2020, 05:40:04 PM »
I'm not talking to you HR.  You like ETF.  I get it that you like to value invest and that's great.  Some of us take on significantly more risk than you.

FDA BLA coming 2021.  By then it'll be priced in at a 3B company.



Like this post: 0

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2020, 09:37:52 PM »
I'm not talking to you HR.  You like ETF.  I get it that you like to value invest and that's great.  Some of us take on significantly more risk than you.

FDA BLA coming 2021.  By then it'll be priced in at a 3B company.

bro,

you know FDA APPROVAL takes YEEEARRRRSSSS
there are many stages to get drug approved

i don't even know where you get your 2021 from
we are talking about at least 5-10 years out

this is just classic PUMP AND DUMP
ride the way and get out



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline theking

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 32592
  • Respect: +837
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2020, 09:53:54 PM »

you know FDA APPROVAL takes YEEEARRRRSSSS
there are many stages to get drug approved

i don't even know where you get your 2021 from
we are talking about at least 5-10 years out

"YEEEARRRRSSSS"??

"at least 5-10 years out??

Quote
The company then submits an application (usually about 100,000 pages) to the FDA for approval, a process that can take up to two and a half years. After final approval, the drug becomes available for physicians to prescribe.




Like this post: 0

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2020, 11:15:15 PM »
"YEEEARRRRSSSS"??

"at least 5-10 years out??
LMAO

get outta here, NOOB
real man are talking here
we know you bank with CHASE 0.01% interest rate
SOOOOO YOU ALREADY LOSING






Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2020, 11:16:22 PM »
wiseman is just blowing smoke
i wouldn't even trust this dude
2021....yea righttttttt
FDA process.....re ad if you want to
but it's takes a freaking long time
5-10 years....maybe even 20-30 years....
long ass time



FDA Approval Process

It’s hard to watch a half-hour television show these days without being inundated with advertisement after advertisement about the latest prescription drugs or medical devices and their abilities. But how can the average consumer be sure the drugs flashing across the screen in fact do what’s promised in their labels? That’s where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — or FDA — comes in. The government regulatory agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services controls the drug-approval process and is tasked with reviewing new drugs and medical devices before companies can sell them.

The FDA’s approval process has garnered many criticisms over the years. For one, drugs and devices often make it to market simply because the manufacturers can demonstrate they are similar to products that were approved in the past — even if those products have since been recalled or have known problems.

Contrary to what most people think, just because a drug or device is FDA-approved, it does not mean the product is guaranteed to be safe. In fact, manufacturers recall about 4,500 drugs and medical devices annually. Many blame the approval process and the way pharmaceutical companies use the system to rush products onto the market.

Sarah Salem-Robinson, OB/GYN PA |  1:38

Sarah Salem-Robinson speaks with Drugwatch.com about the FDA’s role in approving drugs and devices
Sarah Salem-Robinson, OB/GYN PA
Physician Assistant Sarah Salem-Robinson discusses the FDA's role in the drug & device approval process
FDA Drug-Approval Process

A pharmaceutical company seeking FDA approval to sell a new prescription drug must complete a five-step process: discovery/concept, preclinical research, clinical research, FDA review and FDA post-market safety monitoring.

First, the company must conduct laboratory tests and try the drug on animals and then people to make sure it works and is safe.
After testing the drug, the company then sends the FDA a new drug application (NDA), which must include:

    The drug’s test results
    Manufacturing information to demonstrate the company can properly manufacture the drug
    Data gathered during the animal studies and human clinical trials
    The company’s proposed label for the drug, which includes uses for which it has been shown to be effective, possible risks and how to use it

FDA physicians and scientists then review the drug research and the labeling information on how to use the drug. If the findings show the drug’s benefits outweigh its known risks — and that the drug can be manufactured in a way that ensures a quality product — the drug is approved and can be marketed in the U.S. The FDA will continue to monitor the drug post-approval.

The FDA doesn’t actually test the drug itself before making a decision. The agency does, however, inspect the facilities where the drug will be manufactured as part of the approval process.

Vaccines and biologics follow the same general pathway as for drugs.
Researchers testing drugs in laboratory
Pharmaceutical companies, not the FDA, must complete a five-step testing process
Generic Drugs

Generic-drug makers also must gain FDA approval, though they do not need to repeat the clinical trials of the brand-name drug they copy. The application for generic drugs is the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). It’s called “abbreviated” because drug companies don’t need to include animal and human data to establish safety and effectiveness.
Generic Drug Approval
Generic-drug companies must prove that the ingredient in the drug that is effective against the illness or condition it’s treating is the same as that of the brand-name drug.

The companies also must show that the same amount of drug gets to the bloodstream and that it gets there in about the same time as with the brand-name drug.

In other words, generic-drug makers have to prove the generic drug is doing the same thing in the body as the brand-name drug. But there is a barrier for generic-drug makers once they gain FDA approval, and that’s the brand-name companies’ patents.
Drug Patents

Federal law allows generic-drug companies to work on drugs to gain FDA approval before the patents held by the brand-name companies expire. However, when a generic-drug maker files an application with the FDA, it must notify the patent holder if it’s challenging the patent that exists, meaning if the company is claiming the drug doesn’t infringe on the patent or the patent isn’t valid.
Fact
Currently, a new patent is good for 20 years from the date the application is filed in the U.S.

At that point, the brand-name company has 45 days to sue the generic-drug maker, and if there is a suit, the FDA cannot approve the generic drug for 30 months – unless the patent expires or is judged to be invalid or not infringed before that time – or until that generic-drug maker wins in court.

In essence, it’s created a legal battlefield of sorts in which companies are basically fighting over the patent. If a generic-drug maker markets a product and violates a patent, it could end up having to pay the brand-name company damages.

To encourage more generic competition, critics say there should be a limit on the amount of money a generic-drug company is responsible for paying to a brand-name company. A majority of drugs being used are generic drugs, yet most of the money is going to brand-name companies. Part of it is the patent, part of it is marketing.
Pay-for-Delay

There’s no shortage of controversy in the prescription-drug business, with current practices employed by drug companies garnering both support and criticism. Perhaps the biggest controversy today is a concept called “pay-for-delay.”
Fact
A brand-name manufacturer will contact a generic-drug maker who is close to approval and negotiate an agreement. Often times, the generic-drug company is paid not to bring or delay bringing the drug to the marketplace.

Opponents of pay-for-delay say it stifles competition and should not be legal. Proponents of the practice, however, argue it’s the brand-name company’s patent that’s protecting the brand’s market.

The court system has given the Federal Trade Commission more leeway in challenging such agreements as being anticompetitiv e and in violation of antitrust laws.
Over-the–Counter Drugs

Manufacturers of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs can choose to seek FDA approval through the NDA process or under what’s known as an OTC monograph. A monograph is described as a “recipe book” because it specifies the acceptable ingredients, formulations, labeling and testing parameters for more than 80 therapeutic classes of drugs. OTC drugs that follow an existing monograph can be sold without further FDA review. Those that do not conform to a monograph must undergo the NDA process. The FDA continually updates OTC drug monographs to include additional ingredients and labeling as needed.
Faster Approvals

In 1992, the U.S. passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which allows the FDA to collect fees from companies to expedite the drug-approval process.

    “PDUFA has allowed the Food and Drug Administration to bring access to new drugs as fast or faster than anywhere in the world. Since PDUFA was passed in 1992, more than 1,000 drugs and biologics have come to the market.”
    According to the FDA

The act establishes two avenues for gaining approval: Standard Review and Priority Review.

The goal for standard review is to get a drug through the approval process in 10 months. This type of review is applied to a drug that offers little to no improvement over other therapies already on the market.

Priority review is a designation reserved for drugs that offer major advances in treatments or that provide treatment where none existed. It is an accelerated approval process in which the FDA aims to get a drug through the entire process in six months.

The problem with priority review is that it allows an NDA to be approved before means are available to measure the drug’s effectiveness — a step that would usually be required.

“Instead, less traditional measures called surrogate endpoints are used to evaluate effectiveness,” according to the FDA. “These are laboratory findings or signs that may not be a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions, or survives, but are considered likely to predict benefit.”

The time goals set by PDUFA apply to new drug and biological applications as well as resubmissions of original applications and supplements to approved applications.
Reasons Approval may be Delayed or Denied

When the FDA denies a drug approval, it outlines its reasoning in a response letter to the pharmaceutical company that submitted the application. The agency provides the drug company with the opportunity to meet with FDA officials to discuss the issues. The company can then ask for a hearing, correct any issues and submit new information, or withdraw the application.
Fact
Unexpected safety issues, manufacturing issues or a failure to prove a drug’s effectiveness are reasons the FDA may deny a new drug application.

Common problems that may lead to denial include unexpected safety issues or failure to show a drug’s effectiveness. A drug company may need to conduct studies in more people or in different types of people, or studies that span longer periods of time.

Manufacturing issues are also among the reasons that approval may be delayed or denied. The FDA inspects manufacturing facilities before a drug can be approved to make sure the manufacturing practices meet agency standards. If the FDA identifies problems with the manufacturing, the drug company must fix them in order for a drug to be approved.
FDA Medical Device Approval Process

The FDA is also charged with evaluating medical devices. Research for medical devices begins in the lab. Most devices undergo laboratory and animal testing to answer basic questions about safety, and then they are tested on people to make sure they are safe and effective.
Researcher testing on mouse
Most devices undergo animal testing first to answer basic questions about safety

Next, the FDA thoroughly reviews the submitted data and makes a decision whether to approve it. The FDA classifies medical devices based on the risk they pose.

Class I devices are the least risky and include oxygen masks and surgical tools, whereas Class III devices support or sustain life, are implanted in the body or have the potential for unreasonable risk of illness or injury. These include pacemakers, breast implants and HIV diagnostic tests.

Medical devices can change classification s depending on the results of scientific data.
Types of Medical Device Applications

Like with the prescription-drug approval process, there are different types of applications for medical devices, too, depending on the level of risk a device poses.
Did You Know?
No evidence from clinical studies is needed to file a Premarket Notification.

Low- to moderate-risk devices are typically subjected to what’s called premarket notification — also called PMN or 510(k). Federal law requires new device manufacturers to register with the FDA and notify the agency at least 90 days before they start selling their devices. This premarket notification must prove the device is as safe and effective and substantially equivalent to a similar, legally marketed device. No evidence from clinical studies is needed.

High-risk devices undergo premarket approval, the most stringent type of device application required by the FDA. This application is for Class III devices that were found not substantially equivalent to a Class I or II marketed device. In this case, in order to gain FDA approval, there must be enough scientific evidence to prove the device is safe and effective for its intended use.

Another type of application is for a Humanitarian Use Device, which is a device that is intended to benefit patients by treating or diagnosing a disease or condition that affects fewer than 4,000 people in the U.S. annually. This application is similar to a premarket approval application, but pharmaceutical companies are not required to demonstrate effectiveness.
Medical Device Critiques

The FDA has come under fire from critics who say it’s not keeping up with evolving technology. That’s because there have been many recalls of medical devices that turned out to be dangerous once already in use.
Critics Challenge Trials
Many high-risk medical devices are approved based on the results of just one clinical trial; new medications usually require two.

“And only a small minority of clinical studies of medical devices are randomized, controlled and blinded — the gold standard for reliable evidence (and the benchmark to which studies of drugs are held),” cardiologists Rita F. Redberg and Sanket S. Dhruva wrote in The New York Times.

Critics have also raised concerns about the FDA’s monitoring of medical devices once they are on the market. They fear weak oversight could mean problems remain undetected.



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline theking

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 32592
  • Respect: +837
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2020, 05:24:55 PM »
LMAO
get outta here, NOOB
real man are talking here
we know you bank with CHASE 0.01% interest rate
SOOOOO YOU ALREADY LOSING

Well a "NOOB" is still better than a FAKE/FRAUD and NOPE, nothing "real" about the FRAUD "fat 40 virgin that still lives in his mommy's basement"..No wonder he's always "LOSING"...

Quote
"YEEEARRRRSSSS"??

"at least 5-10 years out??"

The process pharmaceutical companies must go through in order to achieve FDA approval, and in turn start selling their drugs, is long and structured. It can take up to two and a half years for the FDA to approve a new dru




Like this post: 0

Offline w1s3m0n

  • PH Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 912
  • Respect: +77
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2020, 02:04:40 PM »
The good news is that five years started 4 years ago.  Check out their slide deck and come back to me.

https://ir.nantkwest.com/static-files/77614f06-5c1f-4c42-8761-b4d2f382425c




Like this post: 0

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2020, 03:04:04 PM »
Well a "NOOB" is still better than a FAKE/FRAUD and NOPE, nothing "real" about the FRAUD "fat 40 virgin that still lives in his mommy's basement"..No wonder he's always "LOSING"...

The process pharmaceutical companies must go through in order to achieve FDA approval, and in turn start selling their drugs, is long and structured. It can take up to two and a half years for the FDA to approve a new dru

The good news is that five years started 4 years ago.  Check out their slide deck and come back to me.

https://ir.nantkwest.com/static-files/77614f06-5c1f-4c42-8761-b4d2f382425c


you need to tell that brother THEKING above
he just google and thats the answer he got
soooooo it must be 2.5 years

LMAO

i just look at the PDF
this drug has been in the works since the 90s
i don't know man
im all for finding cure
but it's too long



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline theking

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 32592
  • Respect: +837
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2020, 03:10:44 PM »

you need to tell that brother THEKING above
he just google and thats the answer he got
soooooo it must be 2.5 years

LMAO

i just look at the PDF
this drug has been in the works since the 90s
i don't know man
im all for finding cure
but it's too long

You still can't tell the difference between drug R&D time and FDA approval time, "FDA Approval is at least 10-15 years out"...  ;D ;D ;D:

bro,

you know FDA APPROVAL takes YEEEARRRRSSSS
there are many stages to get drug approved

i don't even know where you get your 2021 from
we are talking about at least 5-10 years out

this is just classic PUMP AND DUMP
ride the way and get out



Like this post: 0

Offline w1s3m0n

  • PH Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 912
  • Respect: +77
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2020, 05:41:02 PM »
You read it and you didn't understand that there is going to be an FDA approval in 2021?   ???  I'm starting to doubt your ability to comprehend complex information.


you need to tell that brother THEKING above
he just google and thats the answer he got
soooooo it must be 2.5 years

LMAO

i just look at the PDF
this drug has been in the works since the 90s
i don't know man
im all for finding cure
but it's too long



Like this post: 0

Offline theking

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 32592
  • Respect: +837
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2020, 08:23:27 PM »
Funny, you're not the first PH member to call him out for his reading comp issues..just like his basic decimal skills and overall math skills it's a FAIL ;D ;D ;D!



Like this post: 0

Online hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 12258
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +128
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2020, 10:14:22 PM »
You read it and you didn't understand that there is going to be an FDA approval in 2021?   ???  I'm starting to doubt your ability to comprehend complex information.

too long, didn't read
i only scan
drug been in developed since the 90s
(tell our 2.5 years friend above) kekeke

work on some patient
don't work on some

50/50

i don't know about the 2021 approval
shyt can't change
gamble only what you want to lose



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline w1s3m0n

  • PH Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 912
  • Respect: +77
    • View Profile
Re: NantKwest - Full Response to Cancer
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2020, 08:07:07 PM »
To help our brothers out, I made it easier for yall.

Page 9, 35, and 43 have a timeline of FDA approvals forecasted.

Page 36 has the IND and clinical trials they are working on.

Page 42 has the cancer breakthrough they are going to make that year.

Page 44 has a SUPER high-level summary of how the TRIANGLEOFFENS E work to cure cancer.  It's better than CAR-T and DAR-T.

This isn't a gamble.  It's an investment based upon medical science that has been tested for 10 years coming to fruition to the market in the coming years.



Like this post: 0

 

Advertisements