Recent Posts

91

General Discussion / Re: Photo Share: Forrest Gump stop & NOPE ain't no FAKE "side of the road" photos

« Last post by hmgROCK on May 02, 2024, 10:51:43 PM »

you try the fried bread and buy their jewelry at one of the stall???
i did
that fried bread was delicious

NOBODY IS LYING TO YOUR ASS
IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN TRUTH

 



p=pebhmong on the ground..
they have these stall that the native american will sell their craft
this one is empty

92

General Discussion / Re: is it consider GAY....... to protest USA BOMBING AID.... to ISRAEL???

« Last post by theking on May 02, 2024, 10:47:52 PM »

See...even the neutral PH members can "clearly" see it:

This isn’t the only mental illness you have, no need to thank me. 

The Russian invasion crash happened only in your mind and I called that mental illness.

Spoken like a genuine mental case.

"SEEING IS TRULY BELIEVING YO"

 

93

General Discussion / Re: is it consider GAY....... to protest USA BOMBING AID.... to ISRAEL???

« Last post by theking on May 02, 2024, 10:45:22 PM »

It's a public service because you continue to "spamming" more and more LIES...

instead of completing the 12 steps..

Now that's "mental illness right there"...

 

94

General Discussion / what song is your boy ROCK listening to???

« Last post by hmgROCK on May 02, 2024, 10:44:39 PM »

https://youtu.be/Nr0GqiHTSxs?si=iyRXl4QpAPFIcxI4

this is what im jamming to

 

95

General Discussion / Re: Photo share: Eastside GC, this ain't no FAKE side of the road photos

« Last post by theking on May 02, 2024, 10:42:56 PM »

Thanks! 

Yep, it's "legit" unlike hmgLIAR's FAKE ASS "side of the road" (per the neutral PH members) photos...

96

General Discussion / Re: is it consider GAY....... to protest USA BOMBING AID.... to ISRAEL???

« Last post by hmgROCK on May 02, 2024, 10:42:26 PM »

you don’t need to go around spamming dog

mental illness right there

 

97

General Discussion / Re: is it consider GAY....... to protest USA BOMBING AID.... to ISRAEL???

« Last post by theking on May 02, 2024, 10:39:39 PM »

Yeah this is "consider GAY" because the idiot below claimed there's "no girls" so he must be chasing after "dudes":

There no girls here, bro
Just us dudes

No need to lied

i'm going use you for my sexual needs

hmgROCK,

When a woman doesn't see you as a real man who is worth her time...

"SEEING IS TRULY BELIEVING YO"

 

98

General Relationship / Re: BNM…. you think the single hmong divorce mother DEEDA THAO will find another hus

« Last post by hmgROCK on May 02, 2024, 10:37:23 PM »

She probably got her name from Coco Lee's song "Di Da Di Da Di."

she say dee (dwb)
as in like the hmong cucumber

 

i like some of her song
NO HOMO of course

https://youtu.be/jxby1IVZbUw?si=AyvSAAP2CNZ7ix4M

99

General Discussion / This California Democrat Senator's bill is BS

« Last post by theking on May 02, 2024, 10:35:57 PM »

I mean if they paid for the service, they should be able to enjoy the perks right?...Kind of like folks that paid extra for express lines at theme parks, no?  :

Tired of Clear travelers cutting the airport security line? A California lawmaker wants change

A new bill would prevent Clear customers from jumping to the front of the queue at security checkpoints. But Delta, United, and other carriers aren't on board. California could become the first state to transform backlash to services offering front-of-queue privileges into a law that targets TSA line-jumpers.

California could become the first state to transform backlash to services offering front-of-queue privileges into a law that targets TSA line-jumpers.

The California Senate transportation committee is set to vote Tuesday on a bill seeking to bar Clear’s access to screening lanes at airports statewide. The for-profit fast-track security-screening company enjoyed an impressive stock market debut in 2021 under the banner of making travel “frictionless,” but the ride since then has gotten bumpier: Today it’s worth one-third of its peak value from two and half years ago—perhaps a sign of either consumers seeing less bang for their buck, or the public getting more annoyed at new technology that allows people to buy their way to the front of lines everywhere from airport terminals to Disney World to ski resorts.

Clear was able to create a product that made travel faster and more personalized, and leverage that as an excellent branding opportunity during an era when traveling is often hell. Today, for $189 a year, Clear members get a service that verifies their identity using biometrics, plus a smiling “ambassador” who escorts them to the head of the security line. (They must still pass through actual security; Clear merely gives them a way to bypass the travel-document-screening checkpoint.)

The service is currently available in some 50 U.S. airports, as well as a handful of big sports venues. The company has also outlined plans to expand into other industries such as hospitality, healthcare, financial services, and online shopping.

But critics argue at least the airport line-cutting part is an insult to “dignity.” As the bill’s author, California senator Josh Newman, told CBS News: “Everyone is beaten down by the travel experience, and if Clear escorts a customer in front of you and tells TSA, ‘Sorry, I have someone better,’ it’s really frustrating.”

Already, his bill is being incorrectly described as a ban on Clear. The measure would simply stop Clear members from hopping to the front of TSA’s screening lanes. Instead, they’d have to enter the terminal from their own dedicated security lane, separate from general passengers and those using TSA PreCheck.

“The bill doesn’t seek to punish Clear, or put it out of business,” Newman has explained. “It wants to create a better traffic flow so customers aren’t intersecting with the general public and causing a moment of friction that is so frustrating to the average traveler.”

Clear tells Fast Company it would actually welcome this dedicated security lane, although that isn’t an arrangement it or California has the authority to make by itself. The company left criticism of Newman’s bill to Sacramento lawmakers, but a spokesperson did tell us, “We are always working with our airline and airport partners as well as local, state, and federal governments to ensure all travelers have a safer, easier checkpoint experience,” adding that the company has led the way for years on biometrics—it introduced them at airports—and proudly partners with nine California airports, “creating hundreds of jobs, sharing more than $13 million in annual revenue with our California airport partners, and serving nearly 1 million Californians.”

Backers defend Clear by arguing that if consumers want to pay to get special airport entry and the Department of Homeland Security is okay with that, why should individual states stand in their way? It probably doesn’t help that California already bans lots of other things, from gasoline cars to the red dye in Skittles.

The bill enjoys (some) bipartisan support, and at least two heavy-hitting industry allies: flight attendants’ and TSA officers’ unions. The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA and the union representing Bay Area TSA officers both say that Clear represents a flawed pay-to-play system.

Last year, TSA called Clear’s speedy setup “vulnerable to abuse” after a man snuck through its biometrics verification system under a false name. TSA later caught him trying to smuggle ammunition into D.C.’s Reagan National Airport. In the following months, the agency reportedly uncovered at least two more lapses. Those incidents helped lead the Department of Homeland Security to require certain Clear users to present IDs to TSA agents as if they were regular old travelers.

To ensure that glitch never repeats itself, Clear told Fast Company it began rolling out a new system called Next Gen Identity+ late last year. For a minute, that switchover appeared to worsen things; frustrated Clear users took to Reddit and social media to complain that using Clear was suddenly taking longer than waiting in the regular TSA line. But the new system swaps fingerprint or iris scans for iPhone-style face scans that are 40% faster than before, with an aim of eventually allowing travelers to pass through the document-screening stage without breaking stride in this “lane of the future.”

Meanwhile, Clear’s own support network is pretty large. The major airlines are not fans of California’s bill: In a letter, Delta, United, Southwest, JetBlue, Alaska, and Hawaiian said they support Clear’s continued presence at terminals, noting that not only does the service help process airport travelers expeditiously, but also Clear pays $13 million worth of California airport fees. No more Clear would mean those fees could become their responsibility, and that might “further increase air carrier operating costs in the state,” they warn, “potentially resulting in increased fares or decreased service options.”

100

General Relationship / Re: BNM…. you think the single hmong divorce mother DEEDA THAO will find another hus

« Last post by hmgROCK on May 02, 2024, 10:34:04 PM »

Many men will fall head over heels for her and will even offer to
support her children with her.

Does that mean she will not find another husband?

That doesn't mean that at all.  We do have lots of rich available Hmong
businessmen desperate for an available woman like Deeda.

im poor man
if i married her
we will only be eating rice + h20 and squirrels meat that i hunted

these famous hmong are picky