61
Debate Central / Re: Climate Change - Data vs. Dogma
« on: June 12, 2017, 01:26:12 PM »
In my programming class in high school, my teacher said, "little knowledge is a dangerous thing." Some of us know a few terminologies and are already to make conclusions that the experts are wrong. That was what my teacher meant.
In fact, the tobacco industry, the sugar and the supplement industries relies on creating small enough doubt to prevent a conclusion such as smoking causes cancer being made. How did they do it? They hire people ("expert") to come up with result that would contradict the main stream science. Same thing is happening with global warming. Certain people are attract to conspiracy theories. Those people too find themselves attracted to these kind of claims by a few so called experts.
I would rather trust 99 climate scientists than 1 climate scientists. Same with 99 doctors diagnose vs 1 doctor's diagnose.
In fact, the tobacco industry, the sugar and the supplement industries relies on creating small enough doubt to prevent a conclusion such as smoking causes cancer being made. How did they do it? They hire people ("expert") to come up with result that would contradict the main stream science. Same thing is happening with global warming. Certain people are attract to conspiracy theories. Those people too find themselves attracted to these kind of claims by a few so called experts.
I would rather trust 99 climate scientists than 1 climate scientists. Same with 99 doctors diagnose vs 1 doctor's diagnose.