1
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General Discussion / When I was a manager, I realized that there were a lot of lazy people
« on: Today at 09:16:15 AM »
lazy, lazy, lazy BUT wanted the CEO salary.
These lazy people don't want the stress that comes with keeping a business running, BUT OH, they think they should get paid the same wage as the people who really keep the company in operation.
I can't stand it when BLACK WOKE LIBERALS CRY "Our people literally built this company!"
Yeah, you did the low-skill labor part BUT YOU WERE NOT THE VISIONARY WHO ORCHESTRATED AND PLANNED the success of America.
That's like children complaining "But I did the dishes and mopped the floor."
Okay, but do you oversee how the bills are paid? do you inventory what needs to be refilled in the house? do you manage what needs to be done around the house?
NO - not unless the real boss delegates the role to you.
And MORE IMPORTANTLY, ARE YOU THE ONE WHO IS GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE IF THE HOUSE GOES UP IN FLAMES? ARE YOU GOING TO BE THE ONE WHO HAS TO PLAN WHERE THE DISPLACE FAMILY WILL LIVE AND HOW THEY'RE GOING TO EAT?
The majority of employees don't care if the company goes belly up other than the fact that they'll lose their job. But if that happens, they need simply to just apply elsewhere. It's the people at the top that lose and especially those who own the company that have the most to lose. It was their money that invested in this company.
These lazy people don't want the stress that comes with keeping a business running, BUT OH, they think they should get paid the same wage as the people who really keep the company in operation.
I can't stand it when BLACK WOKE LIBERALS CRY "Our people literally built this company!"
Yeah, you did the low-skill labor part BUT YOU WERE NOT THE VISIONARY WHO ORCHESTRATED AND PLANNED the success of America.
That's like children complaining "But I did the dishes and mopped the floor."
Okay, but do you oversee how the bills are paid? do you inventory what needs to be refilled in the house? do you manage what needs to be done around the house?
NO - not unless the real boss delegates the role to you.
And MORE IMPORTANTLY, ARE YOU THE ONE WHO IS GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE IF THE HOUSE GOES UP IN FLAMES? ARE YOU GOING TO BE THE ONE WHO HAS TO PLAN WHERE THE DISPLACE FAMILY WILL LIVE AND HOW THEY'RE GOING TO EAT?
The majority of employees don't care if the company goes belly up other than the fact that they'll lose their job. But if that happens, they need simply to just apply elsewhere. It's the people at the top that lose and especially those who own the company that have the most to lose. It was their money that invested in this company.
3
General Discussion / Dems be expecting gig job to be something it's not, like women who expect...
« on: Today at 09:08:59 AM »
...their hobosexual housemate to be a real husband. 
If you choose to work full time at a gig job - THAT IS YOUR CHOICE AND YOUR PROBLEM.
There are plenty of low skill job positions at companies that offer 401k, PTO, health, dental, and vision benefits. GO WORK THERE.
In fact, this is EXACTLY WHAT YOU SHOULD DO. Let me write the blue print for you:
1. Accept a low skill job with a company that offers benefits even if it's low paying. You are strictly just there for the benefits.
2. Then work the gig job at night.
I know a lot of people who do this and they're just fine. In fact, they're more than fine. I know married couples where the husband is a white collar professional who runs his own small firm/agency. Because he wouldn't be able to get affordable insurance, the wife will get a job as a secretary at a company with benefits for the family. She doesn't need work a high-paying job at all.
Dems are delusional.
If you want a high-paying job then you gots to get the edumacation and skills to qualify. Don't be asking Walmart to increase your pay as a greeter. You think them doctors get paid the big bucks because they slept through school and skipped out on residency?
I'm just so sick and tired of these bums.
If you choose to work full time at a gig job - THAT IS YOUR CHOICE AND YOUR PROBLEM.
There are plenty of low skill job positions at companies that offer 401k, PTO, health, dental, and vision benefits. GO WORK THERE.
In fact, this is EXACTLY WHAT YOU SHOULD DO. Let me write the blue print for you:
1. Accept a low skill job with a company that offers benefits even if it's low paying. You are strictly just there for the benefits.
2. Then work the gig job at night.
I know a lot of people who do this and they're just fine. In fact, they're more than fine. I know married couples where the husband is a white collar professional who runs his own small firm/agency. Because he wouldn't be able to get affordable insurance, the wife will get a job as a secretary at a company with benefits for the family. She doesn't need work a high-paying job at all.
Dems are delusional.
If you want a high-paying job then you gots to get the edumacation and skills to qualify. Don't be asking Walmart to increase your pay as a greeter. You think them doctors get paid the big bucks because they slept through school and skipped out on residency?
I'm just so sick and tired of these bums.
4
General Discussion / Again, the woke minorities ruining it for the rest of us
« on: Today at 08:53:13 AM »
No wonder it's so easy for the Democrats to control them.
GET A REAL JOB AT A COMPANY THAT GIVES YOU THAT STUFF.
The GIG economy is for those who want a side hustle. That stupid Latino female official is WRONG! Not all of us have a side hustle because our main source of income doesn't pay a living wage. We get a side hustle because we're industrious and love to make money. But most importantly, WE WANT TO DO IT ON OUR OWN TIME AND WE WANT THE MONEY AS WE EARN IT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmmWACAfGaY&list=PLTi6COY1KUlsihiFA8DRwSzu0vxPBy3jC&index=17&t=198s
Honestly, this is why I don't want anything to do with dumb, woke, leftist minority communities. I don't live in one and I don't deal with them UNLESS they are a niche market that I can sell services to. I've only had horrible experiences with them because these people have no clue on how to plan, run, and sustain a thriving, flourishing community.
GET A REAL JOB AT A COMPANY THAT GIVES YOU THAT STUFF.
The GIG economy is for those who want a side hustle. That stupid Latino female official is WRONG! Not all of us have a side hustle because our main source of income doesn't pay a living wage. We get a side hustle because we're industrious and love to make money. But most importantly, WE WANT TO DO IT ON OUR OWN TIME AND WE WANT THE MONEY AS WE EARN IT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmmWACAfGaY&list=PLTi6COY1KUlsihiFA8DRwSzu0vxPBy3jC&index=17&t=198s
Honestly, this is why I don't want anything to do with dumb, woke, leftist minority communities. I don't live in one and I don't deal with them UNLESS they are a niche market that I can sell services to. I've only had horrible experiences with them because these people have no clue on how to plan, run, and sustain a thriving, flourishing community.
5
General Relationship / A man who makes a woman wait for years before he'll marry her...
« on: April 17, 2024, 04:53:34 PM »
...is making sure that he has all the power in the relationship.
That is all it is.
The women in this kind of dynamic have been groomed to be codependent since the men who do this tend to have stronger narcissistic traits. The man knows that at this point he can do pretty much anything and get away with it. I'm not even talking about cheating. I'm talking about emotional manipulation using such tactics as: stonewalling, gaslighting, breadcrumbing, and silent treatment. These are all displays of abuse.
Men who do this also tend to have a history of rocky relationships whether the ex was initially toxic or became that way during the course of the relationship due to his hot and cold behavior. Again, this behavior is a test to see how much she'll put up with.
That is all it is.
The women in this kind of dynamic have been groomed to be codependent since the men who do this tend to have stronger narcissistic traits. The man knows that at this point he can do pretty much anything and get away with it. I'm not even talking about cheating. I'm talking about emotional manipulation using such tactics as: stonewalling, gaslighting, breadcrumbing, and silent treatment. These are all displays of abuse.
Men who do this also tend to have a history of rocky relationships whether the ex was initially toxic or became that way during the course of the relationship due to his hot and cold behavior. Again, this behavior is a test to see how much she'll put up with.
6
General Discussion / You know what's racist? hmgROCK living in America
« on: April 17, 2024, 12:15:14 PM »
Why doesn't he live in a predominantly Asian country? Such a racist.
7
General Discussion / According to woke lefties, this type of city is far-right
« on: April 17, 2024, 11:38:22 AM »
If the political scales tip a small percentage in favor of conservatism, the woke lefties label that town/city as right-wing.
According to political polling and election results, this city that should go unnamed, tips 51% towards Republicans. If you do the math, that means 49% lean towards Democrat. But the woke lefties from the metropolitan areas in that same state will not have it. Such a city is right-wing and a threat to their liberal governing politicians at the state level, and there is strong belief that said city is not diverse enough
Never mind the fact that the same unnamed city has sizable black, brown, yellow, red, purple, and green communities. Whites might tip the scale a little but when it comes to the school district, students of color actually make up the larger portion of demographics.
The left is so delusional that they can't even recognize what a diverse city looks like. It's their way or the high way.
There isn't a sinkhole big enough to take out the deranged left.
MAGA = Make Asylums Great Again
There's a straightjacket for every one of these leftist loonies.
According to political polling and election results, this city that should go unnamed, tips 51% towards Republicans. If you do the math, that means 49% lean towards Democrat. But the woke lefties from the metropolitan areas in that same state will not have it. Such a city is right-wing and a threat to their liberal governing politicians at the state level, and there is strong belief that said city is not diverse enough
Never mind the fact that the same unnamed city has sizable black, brown, yellow, red, purple, and green communities. Whites might tip the scale a little but when it comes to the school district, students of color actually make up the larger portion of demographics. The left is so delusional that they can't even recognize what a diverse city looks like. It's their way or the high way.
There isn't a sinkhole big enough to take out the deranged left.
MAGA = Make Asylums Great Again
There's a straightjacket for every one of these leftist loonies.
8
General Discussion / It's MORE racist when you claim to be non-racist, but your city has the most...
« on: April 17, 2024, 11:27:08 AM »
INEQUALITY
Just look at California where there are literally super wealthy living right next door to homeless folks. The disparity is glaringly obvious.
When a white billionaire can step over a homeless black dude as he gets on the subway says a lot about liberal-run cities.
This may explain why LIBERALS talk non-stop about racism because it happens in their areas 24/7.
Just look at California where there are literally super wealthy living right next door to homeless folks. The disparity is glaringly obvious.
When a white billionaire can step over a homeless black dude as he gets on the subway says a lot about liberal-run cities.
This may explain why LIBERALS talk non-stop about racism because it happens in their areas 24/7.
9
General Discussion / The DEEP SOUTH doesn't represent conservatism, unlike San Fran, Detroit, NY, Chi
« on: April 17, 2024, 11:16:22 AM »
IF you have to go deep into the south to find troubling conservatism, then you are really grasping for straws to poke a hole into conservatism.
We don't have to go very far to show failing liberal policies and how they create crapholes. And large ones at that, too. LARGE COSTLY ONES that negatively impact the country.
San Francisco
Oakland
New York City
Chicago
Portland
Seattle
Detroit
These are just a few examples of the huge mess that liberal elites and politicians create. Not to mention, the Left LOVES to tout these cities as representation of who they are.
Calling out the Deep South, which has little influence over American culture and politics, is weaksauce.
We don't have to go very far to show failing liberal policies and how they create crapholes. And large ones at that, too. LARGE COSTLY ONES that negatively impact the country.
San Francisco
Oakland
New York City
Chicago
Portland
Seattle
Detroit
These are just a few examples of the huge mess that liberal elites and politicians create. Not to mention, the Left LOVES to tout these cities as representation of who they are.
Calling out the Deep South, which has little influence over American culture and politics, is weaksauce.
10
General Discussion / hmgRock, IF you're married, Let's see a photo of your wife...
« on: April 17, 2024, 10:29:40 AM »
A confident man like you must surely be married to an amazing woman. As a woman, myself, I can't imagine what female would allow her vajayjay to open itself up to a clown like you. You claim that your wife is an educated professional.
I don't care how successful or attractive a Hmong woman is ----> IF HER MAN IS A CLOWN THEN THAT SAYS EVERYTHING ABOUT HER.
As women, our body is a sacred temple. We must guard ourselves at all times and not allow any transient inside. The problem I see with Hmong women is that they will marry and bear children for any loser. Just look at the many successful and attractive Hmong women who settled for an unattractive bum.
HIGH VALUE WOMEN ATTRACT HIGH VALUE MEN.
Girl, I don't care about your degree, your career, your looks, your family background, and your bank account.
THE FACT THAT YOU ALLOW A CLOWN CLIMB INTO BED WITH YOU EVERY NIGHT SAYS THAT YOU ARE A LOW VALUE WOMAN.
hmgROCK (if he is even married) has a low value wife.
What? She couldn't attract a high value man?
I don't care how successful or attractive a Hmong woman is ----> IF HER MAN IS A CLOWN THEN THAT SAYS EVERYTHING ABOUT HER.
As women, our body is a sacred temple. We must guard ourselves at all times and not allow any transient inside. The problem I see with Hmong women is that they will marry and bear children for any loser. Just look at the many successful and attractive Hmong women who settled for an unattractive bum.
HIGH VALUE WOMEN ATTRACT HIGH VALUE MEN.
Girl, I don't care about your degree, your career, your looks, your family background, and your bank account.
THE FACT THAT YOU ALLOW A CLOWN CLIMB INTO BED WITH YOU EVERY NIGHT SAYS THAT YOU ARE A LOW VALUE WOMAN.
hmgROCK (if he is even married) has a low value wife.
What? She couldn't attract a high value man?
11
General Discussion / How would you translate the Hmong term "tu siab" into English?
« on: April 17, 2024, 10:18:44 AM »
There are several synonyms that come to mind but it depends on the context of why the person feels "tu siab".
Examples:
1. An orphan feels sad for being excluded by his caretakers.
2. A person feels betrayed by their lover.
3. A person feels disappointed in themself for not being enough.
Examples:
1. An orphan feels sad for being excluded by his caretakers.
2. A person feels betrayed by their lover.
3. A person feels disappointed in themself for not being enough.
12
General Discussion / Can you pass the Bar Exam? Let's study together. Question 4:
« on: April 17, 2024, 10:07:22 AM »
Question 4:
A man has four German shepherd dogs that he has trained for guard duty and that he holds for breeding purposes. The man has “Beware of Dogs” signs clearly posted around a fenced-in yard where he keeps the dogs. The man’s next-door neighbor frequently walks past the man’s house and knows about the dogs’ ferocity. One summer day, the neighbor entered the man’s fenced-in yard to retrieve a snow shovel that the man had borrowed during the past winter. The neighbor was attacked by one of the dogs and was severely injured.
In a suit against the man, is the neighbor likely to prevail?
(A) No, because the neighbor knew that the man had dangerous dogs in the yard.
(B) No, because the neighbor was trespassing when he entered the man’s property.
(C) Yes, because the neighbor was an invitee for the purpose of retrieving the shovel.
(D) Yes, because the man was engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.
A man has four German shepherd dogs that he has trained for guard duty and that he holds for breeding purposes. The man has “Beware of Dogs” signs clearly posted around a fenced-in yard where he keeps the dogs. The man’s next-door neighbor frequently walks past the man’s house and knows about the dogs’ ferocity. One summer day, the neighbor entered the man’s fenced-in yard to retrieve a snow shovel that the man had borrowed during the past winter. The neighbor was attacked by one of the dogs and was severely injured.
In a suit against the man, is the neighbor likely to prevail?
(A) No, because the neighbor knew that the man had dangerous dogs in the yard.
(B) No, because the neighbor was trespassing when he entered the man’s property.
(C) Yes, because the neighbor was an invitee for the purpose of retrieving the shovel.
(D) Yes, because the man was engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.
13
General Discussion / Can you pass the Bar Exam? Let's study together. Question 3:
« on: April 17, 2024, 10:04:48 AM »
Question 3:
To keep its public school expenditures under control in a time of increasing costs, a state passed a law providing that children who have not lived in the state for at least one year cannot attend public schools in the state.
Which of the following statements about this law is most accurate as a matter of constitutional law?
(A) The one-year residence requirement is valid because it does not affect any fundamental right or suspect class.
(B) State durational residence requirements that are established for publicly funded services are constitutional because they relate to government operations reserved exclusively to the states by the Tenth Amendment.
(C) Because publicly funded education is a fundamental constitutional right, a state may not deny it to any class of persons who reside in that state.
(D) State durational residence requirements established for this kind of publicly funded service solely for the purpose of reducing state expenditures violate the privileges or immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
To keep its public school expenditures under control in a time of increasing costs, a state passed a law providing that children who have not lived in the state for at least one year cannot attend public schools in the state.
Which of the following statements about this law is most accurate as a matter of constitutional law?
(A) The one-year residence requirement is valid because it does not affect any fundamental right or suspect class.
(B) State durational residence requirements that are established for publicly funded services are constitutional because they relate to government operations reserved exclusively to the states by the Tenth Amendment.
(C) Because publicly funded education is a fundamental constitutional right, a state may not deny it to any class of persons who reside in that state.
(D) State durational residence requirements established for this kind of publicly funded service solely for the purpose of reducing state expenditures violate the privileges or immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
14
General Discussion / How would you translate the Hmong term "xu siab" into English?
« on: April 17, 2024, 09:54:04 AM »
Is it "turned off"?
Disgust and repulse might be too strong.
Disgust and repulse might be too strong.
15
General Discussion / Can you pass the Bar Exam? Let's study together. Question 2:
« on: April 16, 2024, 03:31:13 PM »
Question 2:
A man sued a railroad for personal injuries suffered when his car was struck by a train at an unguarded crossing. A major issue is whether the train sounded its whistle before arriving at the crossing. The railroad has offered the testimony of a resident who has lived near the crossing for 15 years. Although she was not present on the occasion in question, she will testify that, whenever she is home, the train always sounds its whistle before arriving at the crossing.
Is the resident’s testimony admissible?
(A) No, due to the resident’s lack of personal knowledge regarding the incident in question.
(B) No, because habit evidence is limited to the conduct of persons, not businesses.
(C) Yes, as evidence of a routine practice.
(D) Yes, as a summary of her present sense impressions.
A man sued a railroad for personal injuries suffered when his car was struck by a train at an unguarded crossing. A major issue is whether the train sounded its whistle before arriving at the crossing. The railroad has offered the testimony of a resident who has lived near the crossing for 15 years. Although she was not present on the occasion in question, she will testify that, whenever she is home, the train always sounds its whistle before arriving at the crossing.
Is the resident’s testimony admissible?
(A) No, due to the resident’s lack of personal knowledge regarding the incident in question.
(B) No, because habit evidence is limited to the conduct of persons, not businesses.
(C) Yes, as evidence of a routine practice.
(D) Yes, as a summary of her present sense impressions.