PebHmong Discussion Forum
General Category => Debate Central => Topic started by: ProudLao on February 26, 2018, 12:28:29 PM
-
Do you view mass shooting as a domestic terrorism, why or why not?
-
It should be cuz it raises a fear question.
Can't even go to school in peace anymore.
Now they want them teachers to carry a piece n play educator and police man.
Well you know what. Y'all just do that cuz the next shooting, they gonna take out those with guns first. Watch your back should not be a concern on a school campus.
-
there isn't any other better term, then what it is..domestic terrorism.
those who commit such atrocity should automatically be shot on the spot...forget about giving them medical treatment, saving their life, finding out why or even having them go through the court process. if a perpetrator is caught in the act...just put a bullet in the head.
-
It should be cuz it raises a fear question.
Can't even go to school in peace anymore.
Now they want them teachers to carry a piece n play educator and police man.
Well you know what. Y'all just do that cuz the next shooting, they gonna take out those with guns first. Watch your back should not be a concern on a school campus.
if you don't arm yourself, who's going to protect you?
-
if you don't arm yourself, who's going to protect you?
If you don't have arms, how are you going to shoot?
-
Do you view mass shooting as a domestic terrorism, why or why not?
only if the shooter isn't white. If he was white, it's only a mentally ill person who needs help instead of jail time.
-
If you don't have arms, how are you going to shoot?
realistically, we are never going to get rid of all the guns. if the good citizens turn in theirs, only the criminals will have them...then we're all pHucked! people say it's the police/law enforcement's duty to protect you...well, by law they're not obligated to, so we're Phucked twice!
-
Do you view mass shooting as a domestic terrorism, why or why not?
Depends on who is doing the attack...
-
realistically, we are never going to get rid of all the guns. if the good citizens turn in theirs, only the criminals will have them...then we're all pHucked! people say it's the police/law enforcement's duty to protect you...well, by law they're not obligated to, so we're Phucked twice!
Well all them gunners were not criminals prior. They even have flawless records to purchase them guns.
So this whole idea of criminals having guns n the public doesn't is flawed. I'm more scared of the non criminals with guns. They are the sleeper, the quiet ones that are more fawked up when they strike.
Ever heard of the saying, a dog that barks don't bite but watch out for the dog that sneak attack you from the side.
-
Depends on who is doing the attack...
How so?
-
there isn't any other better term, then what it is..domestic terrorism.
those who commit such atrocity should automatically be shot on the spot...forget about giving them medical treatment, saving their life, finding out why or even having them go through the court process. if a perpetrator is caught in the act...just put a bullet in the head.
I a pretty sure there are tons of people believing in an eye for an eye? Then again on the other hand some folks don’t want capital punishment.
-
It should be cuz it raises a fear question.
Can't even go to school in peace anymore.
Now they want them teachers to carry a piece n play educator and police man.
Well you know what. Y'all just do that cuz the next shooting, they gonna take out those with guns first. Watch your back should not be a concern on a school campus.
They will not have my vote having teachers taking arms. There are plenty of other options.
-
How so?
If the attacker is part of a a foreign terrorist group like ISIS and snuck in this country to attack, I considered that foreign terrorism. If the attacker is an American national like Timothy McVeigh, I considered that domestic terrorism..
-
If the attacker is part of a a foreign terrorist group like ISIS and snuck in this country to attack, I considered that foreign terrorism. If the attacker is an American national like Timothy McVeigh, I considered that domestic terrorism..
Well, that one is a giving ;D
I thought you were going to suggest that if would depends on the race ;D
-
Well all them gunners were not criminals prior. They even have flawless records to purchase them guns.
So this whole idea of criminals having guns n the public doesn't is flawed. I'm more scared of the non criminals with guns. They are the sleeper, the quiet ones that are more fawked up when they strike.
Ever heard of the saying, a dog that barks don't bite but watch out for the dog that sneak attack you from the side.
let me shed some light...legall y owned guns used in crimes are far less than those that are illegal used in crime everyday. the vegas shooting, to the orlando (pulse night club) and most recent, parkland school (legally owned guns)...those are incomparable to the gun deaths every day caused by criminals with illegal guns. take chicago for example, 355 shootings up to date, just in 2018 (81 of them homicides)...do you think these were cause by good people? you ban guns and we would be lucky to get pistol whipped instead of getting shot.
mass shooting is like a forest fire...you fight fire with fire. when it happens, you take the path of the fire and burn towards the flame, that will save what is left behind you. just as you can't save everyone in a mass shooting but you can hopefully save/prevent more deaths. the only way to do that is not with your ninja skills but also with a gun.
a person with a gun that has no criminal intent will not shoot you unless he's defending himself or YOU, in case sh!t happens.
-
let me shed some light...legall y owned guns used in crimes are far less than those that are illegal used in crime everyday. the vegas shooting, to the orlando (pulse night club) and most recent, parkland school (legally owned guns)...those are incomparable to the gun deaths every day caused by criminals with illegal guns. take chicago for example, 355 shootings up to date, just in 2018 (81 of them homicides)...do you think these were cause by good people? you ban guns and we would be lucky to get pistol whipped instead of getting shot.
mass shooting is like a forest fire...you fight fire with fire. when it happens, you take the path of the fire and burn towards the flame, that will save what is left behind you. just as you can't save everyone in a mass shooting but you can hopefully save/prevent more deaths. the only way to do that is not with your ninja skills but also with a gun.
a person with a gun that has no criminal intent will not shoot you unless he's defending himself or YOU, in case sh!t happens.
We are talking about mass shooting as the title says.
We don't care about the guy who goes into a bank and try to rob it. Those are criminals intention to steal but shooting other people is collateral damage.
Once again, are mass shooters criminals with previous records? If not then the system made it legally for them to get guns and become mass shooters.
-
If teachers are allow to carry guns, then there must be strict regulations. I think the most important regulation should be that those teachers who choose to carry a gun must keep it on them the entire time. This is to prevent students from taking that gun.
-
I'm with diicck*s and ready to give zdn the diicckk** award cuz d*cks sporting goods just announced that they will not sell assault riffle n will raise the age limit. ****s stocks are trading higher with the news by the ceo.
I'm not preventing people from owning guns cuz it is their rights to do so. I'm banning mass shooters from spraying them bullets at a faster caliber. They can shoot but one bullet at a time like how zdn piss n cum one drop at a time like he has prostate cancer.
-
We are talking about mass shooting as the title says.
We don't care about the guy who goes into a bank and try to rob it. Those are criminals intention to steal but shooting other people is collateral damage.
Once again, are mass shooters criminals with previous records? If not then the system made it legally for them to get guns and become mass shooters.
it's only called a mass shooting because 4 or more are killed, during one occurrence (regardless if it was a bank robbery or people getting shot at a party). did you know, mass shooting can be prevented? how you ask? by stopping the perpetrator after the first few shots fired or at the 1st death instead of having the number of casualties rise.
if you can legally own a gun, why give up your right? 1st amendment gives you the right to say anything, 2nd amendment gives you the right to protect yourself, in case, people don't like what you said and wants to pHuck you in the arse!
-
I'm with diicck*s and ready to give zdn the diicckk** award cuz d*cks sporting goods just announced that they will not sell assault riffle n will raise the age limit. ****s stocks are trading higher with the news by the ceo.
I'm not preventing people from owning guns cuz it is their rights to do so. I'm banning mass shooters from spraying them bullets at a faster caliber. They can shoot but one bullet at a time like how zdn piss n cum one drop at a time like he has prostate cancer.
Actually, assault rifles are illegal to own unless if you have special permits. Dic kss never sold any assault rifles before.