Show Posts
16
General Discussion / Re: If you're a sexist, be gay then. You must read this!
« on: April 03, 2020, 08:47:50 AM »Bruh, scientists are weird. I asked myself, "If you're like this, what's the end result?" You think I'm crazy, but I am not. I am just curious of "What if you're this, what happens to you in the end." For example, what happens if you add all of the chemicals of the world to see what's the result. Almost everything I see is like science. If you don't think outside of the box, then you're not that curious enough to know what you need.
That is not science. Science follows evidence, what you are describing is nothing more than imagining. And asserting something without having gone through the scientific method, is nothing more than an opinion. Thinking outside the box doesn't mean that you are not curious enough to know what you need. Curiosity has nothing to do with capabilities at problem solving. Being skeptical is the key to gaining knowledge of what is true and not true. Be skeptical keeps you from automatically believing in outrageous claims. Being able to think and see outside of the box for ways in solving a puzzle is helpful, but what's more important, is being able to see when the solution to the puzzle is actually inside the box.
A liar, to which American calls them pants of fire, I now get it why they burn real bad because the metaphor is that your life gets all messed up from lying. As for a murderer, he/she gets a bullet in the head while the liar gets tortured from his/her lies. As for a selfish man, the end result that I see from researching, they end up dying alone without creating a family. In fact, they don't get married due to their selfishness. Everything I see has a end result.
And that is the flaw in your logic. You are taking one thing and inserting what you think is the end result and simply calling it as being a fact. Without showing any scientific evidence how point A is the causal connection to point Z, you simply asserted that what you've said is science and that it is true. Calling something science when it is clearly not, is an insult to the scientific community.
Right now, I am studying homosexuality to see why it's wrong or right. If it is wrong, I need to see the end result of a person's life. Hasn't the Old Testament teach you anything?
How are you determing whether or not a particular person had a good life? And how are you measuring their homosexuality in regards to their end life, or life in general? And how many lives of a gay person and a straight person is needed in order qualify as being a general life of a gay or straight person.
It's best you research someone's life of how they end up in order to know "What if you're this, what's my end result?" Once gathering these information, this can totally destroy moral relativism. As many philosopher who thinks outside of the box, they think like me.
Actually, moral relativism will play a big part in all that. Somethings are immoral to you might not be for the other individual and vice versa.
And speaking of philosophers, many of them understand that correlation is not causation.
.
You think that both Adam and Eve don't have belly button during first creation. I think they do have it. It helps carry out genetic DNA code to their future offspring. If Adam and Eve don't have it then the offspring and their descendant wouldn't have it either. That doesn't makes logical sense. Gosh! 
This sort of reminds me of "chicken or egg comes first" analogy test.