PebHmong Discussion Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: YAX on April 19, 2022, 12:23:09 PM
-
Yeah, Trump knows how to pick them.
From Wikipedia:
The American Bar Association (ABA) rated Mizelle "Not Qualified" by a majority and "Qualified" by a minority of the Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary to serve as a federal trial court judge,[15] noting that "Since her admission to the bar Ms. Mizelle has not tried a case, civil or criminal, as lead or co-counsel."[16] Before her appointment, the nominee had only taken part in two trials — both one-day trials in a state court conducted while she was still in law school.[7] Mizelle had eight years of legal experience at the time of her nomination;[16] the ABA typically requires 12 years to give a nominee a rating of "Qualified". The ABA said Mizelle "has a very keen intellect, a strong work ethic and an impressive resume... her integrity and demeanor are not in question."[17] But, the committee wrote, "These attributes... simply do not compensate for the short time she has actually practiced law and her lack of meaningful trial experience."[16]
-
Yeah, Trump knows how to pick them.
From Wikipedia:
Ahaha... article from Wikipedia. :2funny: :2funny: :2funny:
Not as idiotic as the SCJ that was just appointed who can't even define what a "woman" is.
-
Ahaha... article from Wikipedia. :2funny: :2funny: :2funny:
Not as idiotic as the SCJ that was just appointed who can't even define what a "woman" is.
Laughing at this unintended irony.
-
Stop using wiki,twitter, random ass guy on YouTube, pornhub… etc
As your source
;D ;D ;D
-
Stop using wiki,twitter, random ass guy on YouTube, pornhub… etc
As your source
Wiki is pretty good most of the times
***SCRATCH HEAD***
What an EPIC FAIL of a human being... ;D ;D ;D
-
Wiki is not considered a reliable source because contents can change. That doesn't mean what's in the quote is not true. Look it up and tell me which part of the quote is false. Then you can laugh, otherwise, you're just being stupid because the information is very verifiable. ;)
Since you're all too lazy, here's where the sources for the wikipedia statements came from (laughing now?):
"STANDING COMMITTEE ONTHE FEDERAL JUDICIARY RATINGS OF ARTICLE III AND ARTICLE IV JUDICIAL NOMINEES 116TH CONGRESS" (PDF). American Bar Association. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
"Federal judicial nominee lacks enough experience, ABA says in letter explaining 'not qualified' rating". ABA Journal. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
-
does this JUDGE have a PHD degree?
is she a doctor
and does she practice medicine
why is she making healthcare decision???
i say it on my other thread
these judges are getting tooo damn politic
-
remember, Republicans think this is a game and they want to win at any cost. Even cost of human lives.
In everyone elses' eyes, dropped masks means more deaths, but in their eyes: dropped masks means a win for them and lost for Fauci and Libs. :idiot2:
-
Looks like they challenging
These judge are not doctor