PebHmong Discussion Forum
General Category => Debate Central => Topic started by: Hung_Low on August 17, 2022, 03:35:25 PM
-
https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view)
Increased Testosterone Levels Turn Voters More Conservative’ Are You Surprised?
Increasing testosterone levels can turn Democrats more politically conservative. That, according to Professor Paul Zak, the Director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University.
The study – Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats – was published on November 14th, 2021 by Professor Paul Zak, the Director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University.
“His research has made a substantial impact in explaining the variation in human social behaviors and has been cited by other scholars over 18,000 times placing in the top 0.3% of all scholars,” explains his professional biography.
Zak’s latest findings reveal a link between testosterone levels and political preference through analyzing 136 voting-age males throughout the 2012 election season.
His conclusion: “Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red shift” among weakly-affiliated Democrats,” summarized the paper.
When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the strength of their party fell by 12 percent and they reported 45 percent warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president.”
No wonder so many Lefties/Demmies males are trans and walking around with rainbow hair... Not only that, majority of them takes their children to drag and kink shows.
-
Only 136 persons surveyed? Not enough proof.
-
that's why i have LOW T
;D ;D ;D
'oh no you didn't becky'
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/029/697/joffrey.jpg)
-
The desire to follow Trump?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o21fXqguD7U (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o21fXqguD7U)
-
Only 136 persons surveyed? Not enough proof.
Well, I mean they do this all the time with their poll number. I mean, they'll poll like a few hundred people and then boldly claimed the people will vote like this, like that, etc. etc. or support this, that, etc. etc.
-
Well, I mean they do this all the time with their poll number. I mean, they'll poll like a few hundred people and then boldly claimed the people will vote like this, like that, etc. etc. or support this, that, etc. etc.
Yeah. That's why those stats are weak indicators of the actual trends.
I think they should test more like what scientists do: survey thousands of people before drawing a conclusion.