Cams are good California Governor "Nuisance" but what's better is

[theking]

...real consequences that fit the crime...Otherw ise, no point as criminals won't care if they are caught or not and thus, waste more of public resources... :

California governor to deploy 500 surveillance cameras to Oakland to fight crime

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) — Hundreds of high-tech surveillance cameras are being installed in the city of Oakland and surrounding freeways to battle crime, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Friday.

Newsom, a Democrat, said in a news release that the California Highway Patrol has contracted with Flock Safety to install 480 cameras that can identify and track vehicles by license plate, type, color and even decals and bumper stickers. The cameras will provide authorities with real-time alerts of suspect vehicles.

Opponents say the technology infringes on privacy and will lead to further police abuse of already marginalized communities.

But Newsom, who has deployed state attorneys and CHP officers to assist Oakland in its crackdown on crime, said the surveillance network will give law enforcement tools “to effectively combat criminal activity and hold perpetrators accountable — building safer, stronger communities for all Californians.”

[theking]

I bet all the LE resources as well as tax payers resources will be use to go through the whole process but no consequence at the end, so nothing change...same sh1t, different day...

[theking]

Reminds me of some of the red light cams that eventually got phased out in some areas due to too many loopholes.