Again, how did I lose? You didn't explain. And how am I ignorant? Narrow truth vs. Not knowing truth is different. I am the Narrow Truth, like 2+2 will always be 4. That's narrow truth. Where's your evidence to prove that reincarnation is true?
Hahaha.
I was going to explain it, but you just demonstrated it for everybody to see by making your post. But, it's more than likely you won't see it, I'll try to explain it as simply as I can. Hopefully you won't resort to denial.
You are ignorant of your own argument, or perhaps you are simply using one of your usual tactic, gish gallop. It's not, Narrow Truth vs Not knowing the truth. There is no such thing as "narrow truth" in this argument. It is simply, Truth vs Not knowing the truth. 2+2 will always be 4, that's
narrow truth. The argument, concerning reincarnation, is as follows..... Truth(what reincarnation is) vs Not knowing the truth(being ignorant about what reincarnation is).
So, to answer your question....
Again, how did I lose?
By not knowing what reincarnation really is, you lost before you even started the debate. So your, so-called " evidences" are nothing but bullshit.