Not my problem if you are dense and don't read or at least show some learning from me.
Here I am quoting myself from page 3.
I'm showing you why the cake case from Bakersfield was won in favor of the cake owner.
It is against his religion to sell to gay a cake that will be used for a gay event.
He will sell but Don't use it to provoke his religion is the stance.
A cake is not just a good. It is the artistic value to it that is at play here.
The court rule so shush it.