In the case that I was a juror, no gun was ever found. No one saw the victim get shot and therefore, no one could point the finger at who did the shooting. But we, the jury, found him/her guilty. Why? Because you've got to be a fukken moron to not see the big picture after seeing all the evidence and hearing the testimonies. Not a single person, using common sense, logic, and reasoning, ever went not guilty. Because simply, we are not fukken morons.
If it was sunny, then it rained while you were in the basement, and you came back outside and it had stopped raining, but your friend told you to look at the water drops on your car, the puddles on the ground, and the wet grass, you would be a fukken moron to suggest that maybe the fire department activated the firehose down the street. Logic, common sense, and reasoning would suggest that it did fukken rain and if you came to a different conclusion, you are a fukken moron.
These are suggestions made by fukken morons:
Chai Vang shoots people in the back and some victims were shot multiple times. Chai Vang was never shot or suffered any physical injury.
Moron: His actions are justified.
Chai Vang flees the area, comes across other hunters and suggests for a ride out of the area. He didn't mention anything about the shootings.
Moron: He was scared! He was scared of white people....but he still approached white people for a ride!
Chai Vang's home has been visited multiple times by Minneapolis Police because of disturbance calls involving being violent towards his significant other.
Moron: What does that have to do with anything? I mean, it shows that he has the capacity to be violent, but whatevvvvvvvvv
eeeeer.
Fukken morons, I tell ya...
Hypothetical aliens is not a strong argument anyways. We're talking about people on the jury, not aliens. In the real world with real people, 1/12 are decent odds if Vang never took the stand and if he had a better lawyer.
Aliens were used as a example to show that if you presented this case to a certain group which had no bias, no prejudice, no interest towards the human races and race relations and race implications, that they would find that Chai Vang was the aggressor and did not shoot in self-defense nor was his actions justified.
Wow. You took aliens literally.