OMG, you know the definition of
precise and
accuracy, and you STILL don't know how to use them.
1. Technically, you wanted to use
accurate because you wanted to correct a mistake. It doesn't really matter because we still know what you meant. The problem now is that you are confusing the two.
2. Scientists want to be accurate AND precise. You would know this if you are a scientist.
3. Was there any confusion with the usage of "round?" It seems pretty obvious that it was in comparison to a flat Earth....which in this incorrect theory, is not perfectly flat either; however, we know what it means.
4. You're not helpful when you present misinformation
.
All of this is supposed to be a fun exercise in basic science. You are making it into a You vs. Somebody thing.
What is velocity? Do scientists want to be precise, accurate, or both? What did 17th century scholars think of a flat Earth? If your facts are wrong, what makes you think your analysis is correct?
Don't quit your day job.
The proper lexicon is precise for precision. Accuracy isn't always repeatable. You would know this if you are a scientist because science is about reproducible something that is repeatable.
Anyways, I was hoping to be helpful but looks like this is all a scheme to make talking science a chore. Don't quit your day job.