First, we see and know that men are physically stronger than women and majority of hunters are men...
But then Wokism happened and we're told that there is no differences in men and women and that men can identified as women and compete against them in sports, etc etc
Now, wokism has seep into the mind of these 'expert' scientists... They claim that pre-historic women are much better hunters than pre-historic men - all base on estrogen and women's metalolism (a lot of watching lion hunt where the female hunt while the male just eat).
https://news.yahoo.com/prehistoric-women-were-probably-better-193819280.htmlAccording to these 'scientists' estrogen and women's metabolism eliminate wasted energy.
"Oestrogen, often dubbed the female hormone, and adiponectin are both present in women at higher levels and provide physical advantages over men" Also, their wide hip makes them able to move, turn, twist and run faster than men. She also claimed that women are naturally better at marathon... Hmmm, I've not seen any woman beat the man's marathon record yet.
"
The scientists view their research not as rewriting history, but as trying to correct a history that has already erased the role of women. “I want people to be able to change these ideas of female physical inferiority that have been around for so long,” Dr Ocobock said."I'm not scientist or an expert but men are superior to women in physical activities... bigger, faster, stronger, etc etc. Anyone that says otherwise has sh1t for brain.
Honestly, if these 'experts' suggested that women are better 'gatherer' I would like believe them, however... better hunters? That's like saying the top female boxer can beat the top male boxer in the same weight class.