Did a New Hampshire Fed judge opened a pandora's box?

[Hung_Low]

Fed Judge blocked Trump's birthright citizenship EO... sighting that the class action lawsuit brought on by the ACLU is legit.

NYT and other media wrote about it... BUT they ignored what's really inside the ruling... They claimed that his ruling is a nationwide injunction to protect babies who would have been subject to the EO, including babies of undocumented and academic on student visa because it will do them harm...

However, if you read his ruling... Judge Laplante stated...
In light of the above, this court grant the petitioners' motion and provisionally certifies the following class for the purpose of preliminary injunctive relief. All current and future persons who are born on or after Feb. 20, 2025, where that person... (goes on to clearified what these people are, namely illegals and people with visa).

Did you see what I highlighted there... 'future person' - meaning, the unborn or those that would be conceived in the future. So, this judge and the ACLU see the unborn AND future babies as a class of people. And this judge ruled that the injunction is in affect for the unborn and future person because it will do them harm...

This opened the way for Anti-abortion activists to sued the state and abortion laws... for the harming of 'future persons'. And for state to prosecute abortion doctors and or women for murder. CA and some states already have Fetal Homicide Law - a person can be charge for double murder if a pregnant woman is killed with her unborn, even if the criminal did not realized she's pregnant. In CA, a fetus does not need to be viable to be charged with double homicide. However, this does not applied to abortion because an abortion is consider a medical procedure 

Now, I also find it interesting that this judge also believed that district Fed judges can't make nationwide injunction ruling, however, this case is different because it's a class action lawsuit (brought on by the ACLU representing residence of N.H.) So, his decision on this case is a nationwide injunction LMAO!!!

[Prude]

I didn't know that a district judge's decision controls the country. I thought only the SCOTUS can
issue a law for the whole country.

Isn't a district judge's decision good only for that district? That's why she is called District Judge.

I think the journalism industry needs to research more before making people believe that district judge's order.

True that future persons can't be used as a protection in the order. Who knows if they exist. They don't
even exist at the time of the order. We can't issue an order for something that's uncertain.

I think that order can be appealed and won successfully.