I actually have no idea what your point is. What are you trying to prove?
All I am saying is that I did my DNA test and I am not 100% East Asian as I had expected. And, the 11% Polynesia was a surprise. If I am 11% Polynesian, it means I am only 50% or less of what my parents are. So, say my father is 100% East Asian, it would mean that my mom is at least 22% Polynesian or more. I think both my parents have Polynesian in them because I don't believe my mom is 22%+. Now, when I say Polynesian, I'm not talking about the Polynesians now. I am talking about the "grouped" name that Ancestry.com uses. I'm curious as to why I have "Polynesian" in me. And, I'm not the only one. I have at least 3 pages of DNA matches that are mostly (if not all) Hmong people. These matches are based on the formula Ancestry uses and the matches are like 3-4th cousin all the way down to like 10th cousin or something. It's intriguing because I don't even know who those Hmong people are and they are supposed to be my 3rd cousin?
Again, I don't understand your point but I do know that you are trying to throw these large groups of studies in here and I'm not sure how it's helping because I'm basically and simply stating what my DNA showed and the report that came with it to explain the two ethnicity. Also, as I've said before, I'm not done. I want to know further about my DNA, not about the breakdown of the big ethnicity around Asia. I'm less interested in knowing where all the ethnicity are in Asia and more interested in just learning about who I am. I hope you understand.
Also, my data came from my Ancestry.com with my DNA results, and that's what I'm going by. I don't know enough about DNA testing to make up stuff.