Free Agency Winners and Losers:
WINNERS
Tom Brady: This one is two-fold.
The first is obvious. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers said they'd keep their championship team together, and so far they've somehow mostly done that. Once Shaq Barrett was retained, the Buccaneers ensured they'd have most of their key pieces back. Chris Godwin returns on the franchise tag, Rob Gronkowski returned on a one-year deal, Lavonte David got a nice extension too. The Buccaneers have a shot to repeat.
Meanwhile, Brady's Super Bowl win might have broken Bill Belichick. The Patriots spent like they'd just gotten their tax return and there was a big sale on Amazon. It's incorrect to say the Patriots have never been big spenders, but not like this. Don't buy any notion that this was the plan all along, to have a losing season (because the greatest coach ever is going to want to not make the playoffs in his late 60s?) and spend like crazy in 2021. The Patriots just finally had a bad season, and it coincided with their longtime quarterback finding a championship elsewhere. New England needed a lot of talent and did get that in free agency. They'd have wanted to improve whether they went 7-9 with Brady or anyone else at quarterback. But it's reasonable to believe at least part of the spending spree was a reaction to seeing Brady have ultimate success in his first year away from New England
As always, Tom Brady wins.
Trent Williams and the San Francisco 49ers: Williams' path shows just how messed up the Washington Football Team has been, at least before Ron Rivera got to town.
Williams was alienated by Washington to the point he sat out the whole 2019 season. There were issues with the medical staff, but Washington never wanted to seem to pay their best player. The 49ers had no problem doing it.
The 49ers turned a low-cost trade with Washington into a long-term relationship with a future Hall-of-Fame tackle. Williams signed a six-year, $138 million deal that looks more like a quarterback deal and makes Williams the highest-paid offensive lineman ever. Yes, that's the same player Washington basically ran out of town. Williams is 32 and there's some risk in his play falling off, but it's still worth the gamble for the 49ers. San Francisco should rebound in 2021 after a tough-luck season, and the key piece of the offseason might not have been dumping Jimmy Garoppolo, but signing one of the better left tackles in recent history. They got it done.
Jameis Winston: The quarterback free-agency market can be difficult for players too, at least the flawed ones. For those who find themselves out of a starting job, it can be hard to find a perfect landing spot.
Winston played the game as well as he could.
A year ago, when it was clear Winston wouldn't find a starting spot worth chasing despite leading the NFL in passing yards the year before, he took a surprisingly small one-year, $1.1 million deal with the New Orleans Saints. He presumably could have made more elsewhere. He might have found a bad team that would have let him compete for a starting job. But he knew what he was doing.
This offseason Winston saw Drew Brees retire, as expected, and re-signed a one-year $5.5 million deal with the expectation that he will be the frontrunner to start for the Saints in 2021. He could get beat out by Taysom Hill — Sean Payton's adoration of Hill knows few bounds — but Winston will have a chance to enter camp as the presumed favorite to win the starting job in a great offense run by one of the best coaches in the NFL. Then he'll be a free agent again.
You have to admit, it was a pretty brilliant plan.
LOSERS
Green Bay Packers: There's this notion that receivers will drop everything in free agency to come play with a great quarterback. It's not true, but you hear it a lot. And still, the Packers can't (or don't want to) sign a great receiver to play with Aaron Rodgers.
There are some big-ticket receivers out there and none are connected to the Packers. Either of the big-name tight ends that went to New England would have been nice. Even a cornerback to help the defense would have been good, but the Packers (who don't have a ton of cap space) sat out.
There's still a long, long way to go in the offseason and maybe the Packers will make some key additions. You'd just like to see them be a little more aggressive. It's not the first time that's been said.
The one big move the Packers did make was to bring Aaron Jones back on a four-year, $48 million deal. Jones is a very good back, but even good backs don't often work out on big second contracts. The Packers drafted running back A.J. Dillon in he second round last year and he showed promise, but now will spend at least another year or two in a minor role. Dillon and quarterback Jordan Love, Green Bay's oft-debated 2020 first rounder, seem destined to be wasteful picks. Not ideal in a championship window.
The Packers aren't having some disastrous offseason. But after coming up one game short of an NFC title the last two years, you'd like to see them get a little wild in free agency. For a change.
Los Angeles Rams: The Rams don't seem to lose anything when they see good players leave in free agency. Still, already this offseason the Rams saw safety John Johnson III sign a big deal with the Cleveland Browns, and then defensive lineman Michael Brockers was traded to the Detroit Lions for a seventh-round pick. Moves like that happen when you're searching for cap flexibility, which was needed to re-sign pass rusher Leonard Floyd (a solid signing by the Rams). The Rams also lost defensive coordinator Brandon Staley, who took the head coaching job with the Los Angeles Chargers. The Rams had a fantastic defense last season and still might this year, but it won't be easy to maintain. The offense took a hit too when tight end Gerald Everett signed with the division rival Seattle Seahawks.
The Rams were touted as a potential Super Bowl winner after landing Matthew Stafford in a trade. They still are in tier of preseason contenders. But the Rams' spending — in terms of picks traded and contracts given out — has a bill attached at the end and it does cost them good players. For a team with championship hopes, the first week of free agency wasn't ideal.
Indianapolis Colts, to this point: Maybe it's the idea that a good team with cap room should be spending money to push itself over the hump. But the Colts never do, and it can be frustrating.
Indianapolis has done a good job building a strong roster and, admittedly, part of that is not overspending on free agents. The Colts might look wise in a week or two for skipping the first wave of free agency and finding mid-tier players on short deals after that. They've done that before.
But once the Colts traded for Carson Wentz, they didn't need to worry about quarterback and had the ability to add to a potential AFC South championship roster. They're sticking (stubbornly?) with their philosophy. That's fine, but maybe there will be some regret if they fall just short with a good young roster and are sitting on a mound of unspent cap space. Indianapolis had the second-most cap space in the NFL as of Friday and hadn't signed anyone of note.
We'll reserve final judgment and it's understandable that the Colts have a philosophy and want to stick with it, but it would be a lot more interesting if they made an aggressive run one of these offseasons.
Topic: NFL Winners and Losers, agree?? (Read 550 times)