Advertisement

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - theking

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 1785
16
...wasting my time:

Quote
I'm not voting for Trump or Biden. You want my vote? Choose better candidates.

Shortly after Nikki Haley dropped out of the GOP presidential primary on March 6, I wrote a column stating that though I'm a conservative, I won’t vote for either Donald Trump or Joe Biden.

Despite dozens of furious emails proclaiming that I am not a real conservative, that I am some secret Democrat, or encouraging me to vote Biden, I have not changed my mind.

However, I think that one argument is worth addressing. Many people read the column and told me that every vote is valuable and my choice to not vote is throwing away my right to have my voice heard.

We are unbelievably lucky in America to have a vote that actually matters. That is something I do not take for granted. As much as people like to incorrectly claim that our elections are somehow rigged, we do not live in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, where he recently received a staggering 87% of the vote in an election devoid of any meaningful opposition.

Why would I vote for somebody I do not believe should lead us?
I understand why my willingness to discard that voting right is off-putting to many. It's something I wrestled with for years as a hypothetical scenario that has become a dreadful reality.

My thought process is simple: I cannot in good conscience vote for Biden, who has entirely neglected his duty as president to secure the border and has weaponized the Department of Justice against pro-lifers, alongside countless other abuses of power and failed policies.

At the same time, Trump is an unacceptable candidate due to his actions in the fallout of the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, his refusal to debate other GOP candidates in this primary cycle and his self-admitted history of abusing women.

Why would anybody vote for these candidates?

My generation is up for grabs. Don't believe the narrative that Gen Z will vote Biden.

Rather than choose to vote for someone I think is entirely unfit for office, I would prefer to use my vote to tell the major political parties that they have failed. I hope other conservatives join me. Our choice to vote in other 2024 races while ignoring the presidency would send a clear message that earning the White House requires a candidate worthy of it. We can still vote in state elections that matter.

We criticize Democrats for voting for the "Weekend-At-Bernie’s"-esque candidate: Biden. But we also need to have standards, even if that means potentially losing an election to prove that point.

Gen Z has a chance to voice our dissatisfactio n
One quarter of Generation Z is reluctant to vote for either Trump or Biden. People from my age crave normalcy when it comes to candidate selection and had a chance to capitalize on that desire.

While Gen Z does skew heavily toward the left, such a significant portion of us not being sold on Biden shows a missed opportunity by Republicans who only had to nominate a candidate capable of capturing moderate voters.

Pence won't endorse Trump. Here's why that doesn't actually matter.

Our best course of action as a generation is to not choose the lesser of two evils, but rather show the two major parties that our votes could have been won had they chosen different candidates. While I personally would be very unlikely to vote for anyone the Democrats could nominate for president, much of my generation is ready to jump on board, especially when the alternative is Trump.

Republican voters need to realize this is bigger than winning one election
As for Republicans, we should not fall victim to the lie that the fate of the country is at stake with this election. That rhetoric is helpful for rallying voters to your side but is dishonest. Our country will survive Biden’s first disastrous presidency, and it can survive another four years.

Our country survived Trump’s fruitless attempts to retain power after he lost the presidency in 2020, and it would survive a second term of his as well. Presidents do not determine the fate of our country, as much as doomsayers on both sides like to forecast.

The fate of America is not at stake in this specific election, but rather in all future elections. If America's two major political parties continue to offer disastrous candidates, then America will remain in political distress.

My choice to not vote for Trump or Biden is one that is rooted in concern for the future, not the tales of imminent doomsday the pundits forecast.

17
...changed party. Regardless of party, bet he'll still be a compulsive serial LIAR:

Quote
George Santos says he’s leaving the Republican Party and will run for Congress as an independent

“I in good conscience cannot affiliate myself with a party that stands for nothing and falls for everything,” he wrote on X. “I am officially suspending my petitioning in #NY01 to access the ballot as a Republican and will be filling to run as an independent.”

18
Starting salary is an issue and then when Teachers try to do side hustle, they get fired...

It's no wonder there's a shortage of Teachers..  ::)

Quote
Michigan teacher fired after parent exposes her creative side hustle
Domonique Brown, who also goes by the rap name Drippin Honey, was voted teacher of the month in December


By day, Domonique Brown was a history teacher at Taylor Preparatory High School in the Detroit area, but in her off hours the educator worked as an aspiring rapper named Drippin Honey.

That is until she was let go from her job.

Brown told FOX 2 that a parent complained that she was a "bad influence" on her students because she’s a rapper, despite being voted teacher of the month in December.

She said she never received a complaint in writing and asked the administration, "Could we ask the parent to come in and see professionalis m, see me in a classroom, see me after school, see me at all the games, see me dropping kids off every day, buying food, doing all these things? Can they come see me in my element before they try to say I’m unprofessional?"

Brown said the parent remained anonymous and didn’t go into detail about what they found objectionable about her rapping.

"Music is part of the culture. We’re from Motown. This is what we do," she added.

This week, after her firing, Brown posted a music video on her social media that she made with some of her students.

In the video, "Drippin 101," Brown danced with her students and rapped about "Motown, baby, going crazy like the ‘80s."

19
Eric Trump says he was laughed at while attempting to secure his dad's $454 million bond

On Monday, Donald Trump will be called upon to make good on the $454 million judgment in his New York fraud case or post bond in order to appeal the ruling. And if this doesn't happen, AG Letitia James is prepared to seize his assets in an effort to ensure that gets paid one way or another.

In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday, Eric Trump re-circulated the story initiated by Trump's team that they've been turned down by every lender they've reached out to regarding the bond, saying that they basically laughed in his face.

"This is 'lawfare,'” the younger Trump said. "They want to hurt my father, who’s winning the presidential race right now. He’s beating Biden in every single poll in every single swing state. He came out and said he wants to put hundreds of millions of dollars of his own money into his campaign. And, how do they deprive him of that? They have (Judge Arthur Engoron) come up with an astronomical number, give you zero time to post a bond, a bond that’s not even commercially available in the United States. It’s not — no one’s ever seen a bond this size. Every single person when I came to them saying, 'Hey, can I get a half-billion-dollar bond?' Maria, they were laughing. They were laughing. Top executives of the largest surety companies had never seen anything of this size. What, they’re going to start seizing assets if he can’t put up something that’s not available in the United States?"

20
Russia's recruited so many inmates to fight in Ukraine that it's shuttering some of its prisons

The military's reliance on inmates to plug its manpower gaps has caused Russia's prison population to plummet. Russia's Deputy Justice Minister Vsevolod Vukolov revealed in October that the country's prison population plunged from 420,000 before the war to a historic low of 266,000, per The Washington Post.

21
And the plot thickens...

Quote
Shohei Ohtani interpreter scandal: Major holes poked in Ippei Mizuhara's pre-Ohtani résumé

The Shohei Ohtani interpreter scandal has somehow become even weirder.

Last we left the Los Angeles Dodgers star, his camp had accused his longtime interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, of stealing $4.5 million to cover his illegal gambling debts, though only after telling a reporter that Ohtani had agreed to give Mizuhara the money. Since then, Mizuhara has been fired, and MLB has opened an investigation into the matter.

The situation, naturally, has drawn scrutiny for the 39-year-old Mizuhara, and it appears that the spotlight is burning some holes in his résumé before he met Ohtani — namely, his education and past experience in baseball.

UC Riverside says Ippei Mizuhara never attended the school
Before this week, Mizuhara was widely reported to have been born in Hokkaido, Japan, moved to the U.S. at a young age, attended Diamond Bar High School in Los Angeles County and graduated from the University of California-Riverside in 2007.

It appears that last part, which was stated as fact in the Angels' 2023 media guide, is not true. UC Riverside told The Athletic's Sam Blum that it has no record of Mizuhara attending the school:

“Our university records do not show a student by the name of Ippei Mizuhara having attended UC Riverside.”

UC Riverside reportedly didn't respond when asked if Mizuhara could have attended the school under a different name, but he definitely went by the name in high school, as his high school soccer coach described him as a hard worker to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune last week.

Red Sox say Ippei Mizuhara never worked for the team
The lore of Ohtani and Mizuhara's friendship is based around them both joining the Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters in 2013, Ohtani as a rookie first overall pick and Mizuhara as an interpreter for the team's English-speaking players.

Before that, Mizuhara was said to have worked his first job in baseball as an interpreter for Boston Red Sox pitcher Hideki Okajima from 2007 to 2011.

The Red Sox released a statement Friday saying that Mizuhara had never worked for them in any way:

"We are reaching out to all of you because of reports in various outlets stating that Ippei Mizuhara worked for the Red Sox as an interpreter, which is incorrect. Mizuhara was never employed by the Boston Red Sox in any capacity and was not an interpreter for Hideki Okajima during the pitcher's time with the team. Please know we have thoroughly checked our files to ensure we are providing accurate information."

Mizuhara apparently wasn't that good of an interpreter either, if you believe Jon Heyman of the New York Post. That makes a lot more sense now.

Ippei Mizuhara couldn't have worked for the Yankees either
After the Red Sox, the Angels media guide stated that Mizuhara continued to interpret for Okajima with the New York Yankees in spring training 2012.

As The Athletic notes, there's one problem with that: Okajima reportedly failed a physical with the Yankees on Feb. 17, 2012, before the beginning of spring training. It's possible that Mizuhara could have interpreted for Okajima in the time between when he signed the minor-league deal and the start of camp, but that seems unlikely.

Ippei Mizuhara had a dream job interpreting for Shohei Ohtani. It has all come crashing down. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel, File)
Ippei Mizuhara had a dream job interpreting for Shohei Ohtani. It has all come crashing down. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
So what does all this mean?

We know Mizuhara graduated high school in 2003 and joined the Fighters in 2013, where he met Ohtani. In the 10 years between, he was widely reported to have attended college in the U.S. and worked for two different MLB teams, but there is now a gaping hole in that background. It makes you wonder what kind of vetting the Fighters did when hiring him.

From there, Mizuhara befriended Ohtani starting when the slugger was 19, went with him to the Angels and followed him to the Dodgers. He wasn't just an interpreter; he was Ohtani's personal assistant and one of his best friends.

There are many ways this saga could play out in the coming months as MLB and other authorities investigate, but so far, it seems that every day of this scandal has made the situation worse for Mizuhara.

22
‘It doesn’t work’: This Florida waitress says she tried doing what she loves but couldn’t afford to live

Waiting tables is a common way for students to make some extra pocket change while in college. But now, many keep serving way past college graduation.

Genevieve Sleboda, who goes by @genevieve.show on TikTok, revealed that she is one of these people in a viral video. After graduating with a master’s degree in education, she realized that none of the jobs in her field pay enough to cover her rent.

The Fort Lauderdale, Florida resident took a serving job at a bar instead — which she claims pays better than an education job.

“In this economy, as a post-grad Gen Z, I cannot afford to start a career on a first-year salary,” Sleboda says.

“I tried doing what I love — it doesn’t work out for me.”

Education vs serving

Jobs in Sleboda’s field of education pay a decent salary. Teachers make a median salary of $61,250, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This falls slightly above the median national yearly earnings of $59,540.

But Sleboda says that when she has worked in education, it was bad news for her wallet: “I’ve had to take money out of my savings to pay my rent.”

Rent.com reports the median Florida rent as $2,099 per month — which equals over $25,000 over a year. This would mean that Sleboda would spend nearly half (41%) of her $61,250 education salary on rent.

Though servers tend to make less money per year than teachers — the BLS reports a median of $29,120 per year — they can make a lot in tips. Staffing platform Adia approximates that servers bring in $100 in tips per night. And none of those earnings are taxed.

If you work five shifts per week, you could bring in an extra $500 a week. By the end of the year, you’ll have an additional $24,000, nearly doubling your salary to $53,000 — almost as much as a teacher.

Not only could you bring in a similar amount of income to a teacher through serving, you’ll also avoid all the unpaid parts of the education profession: marking, lesson planning and parent calls. On an hourly basis, you may even find yourself coming out ahead, as Sleboda does.

Read more: The US dollar has lost 87% of its purchasing power since 1971 — invest in this stable asset before you lose your retirement fund

23
Like this Republican. He had a shot at beating Diane Feinstein but shot himself on the foot for being a LYING HYPOCRITE and got caught red-handed so that was the end of his run and all the millions of dollars out of his own pocket wasted  ;D:

Quote
Huffington Admits Fault in Hiring Illegal Immigrant

SANTA BARBARA —  In an emotional confession of wrongdoing, Republican Senate candidate Mike Huffington and his wife, Arianna, told reporters at a news conference Thursday that they violated federal law by employing an illegal immigrant at their home for at least four years and that they did not pay the required taxes on her salary for about a year.
The GOP candidate blamed his wife for hiring the woman and said he had not been involved in the decision, but took responsibility because, “as the head of my household, the buck stops with me.” Huffington also said he would pay a fine if he is cited by authorities, but he downplayed the seriousness of the violation.

“We have made a mistake, there is no question about it,” said Huffington, who is challenging Sen. Dianne Feinstein. “(But) who among us has not broken the law? Who among us has not rolled through a stop sign? Who among us has not gone past 55 miles an hour? . . . We are all human . . . and if we make a mistake . . . we should own up to it. Which I have done and Arianna has done.”

The Immigration and Naturalization Service said Thursday that, based on the information first disclosed by The Times, investigators will begin an inquiry to determine whether laws were broken. Since 1986, federal law has made it a crime for employers to hire illegal immigrants, with violators subject to fines of up to $10,000 per worker.

“Based on (news reports), we are going to look into the matter,” said Virginia Kice, spokeswoman for the INS western regional headquarters in Laguna Niguel.

In his comments Thursday, Huffington downplayed an accusation that he and his campaign had made without offering proof Wednesday night: that Feinstein had also employed illegal immigrants on her household staff.

Feinstein denied the allegation Thursday in a San Francisco campaign appearance. She added: “I think here is a situation where he would not have told the truth again had he not been confronted with the real facts.”

Gov. Pete Wilson declined to comment directly on Huffington’s situation, but stated: “What I will say is, the law requires that employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants suffer a penalty.”

Political experts said Huffington’s confession is likely to damage the Republican campaign, especially because the candidate has been such an outspoken opponent of illegal immigration and supporter of Proposition 187, the controversial measure on the ballot that would deny education and health benefits to illegal immigrants. In the news conference Thursday, Huffington seemed to soften his immigration views.

ADVERTISING

“It suggests that his position on this issue is one fraught with hypocrisy,” said Larry Berg, director of the Jesse Unruh Institute of Politics at USC. “If you are going to say what he has said for the past six months, this is not something you want to do.”

The Feinstein campaign reportedly was preparing a television ad late Thursday to attack Huffington on the issue.

In the news conference, Huffington said that against his better judgment the couple retained the immigrant as a nanny for their children because the children had grown so close to her. The Huffingtons said they tried to obtain federal approval for the woman to work in the country legally, but she remained undocumented throughout her employment.

“This was not a case of cheap labor, this is not a case of (abusing) an illegal immigrant,” Arianna Huffington said. “This is a case of a family falling in love with another human being who is still very much a part of our family and our hearts. I did, as a citizen, make a mistake legally. As a mother, I still don’t know what I would have done if this came up today.”

Arianna Huffington said the woman’s job ended in the summer of 1993, several months after her husband was sworn in as a freshman congressman and shortly before he announced his challenge to Feinstein. They said the employee chose to leave because the children moved to Washington when Huffington became a congressman and she wanted to remain in California.

Huffington’s campaign, locked in a close race with Feinstein less than two weeks before Election Day, scrambled Thursday to assess the political damage after the disclosure quickly drew national attention. The candidate canceled a morning event in Los Angeles, and staff members huddled at the Orange County campaign headquarters without making statements to the media.

At about 2 p.m., the campaign alerted the media to a 4 p.m. news conference in Santa Barbara. The stated purpose of the gathering was “to set the record straight,” but it also raised some questions:

* Asked to reconcile how he could employ an illegal immigrant when he demanded others should leave the country, Huffington seemed to shift his campaign rhetoric. Instead of seeking the ouster of illegal immigrants in the country, Huffington said, his support of the measure was primarily aimed at easing a financial burden on the state. At one point he seemed to say that he thought there was nothing wrong with employing illegal immigrants, as long as state tax money is not involved.

“If there are illegal immigrants here who are using taxpayer-paid services . . . that is not appropriate,” he said, adding that he also supported more guards to enforce the border. “Neither of those things had to do with our employment of this individual.

“I have never said that we should go from house to house . . . and find household help that has come into the country illegally and send them back to their country,” he added. “I have said, though, anyone using state services such as welfare or education or health care, if they are being paid for by the state, not by private citizens, but by the state, that’s an inappropriate use of funds. And that is one reason I said I would vote for 187.”

* Huffington said his wife did not know the citizenship status of the employee when she was hired. But since 1986, federal law has required that employers ask for proof of citizenship and record the evidence in a document known as an I-9 form. The form is required to be kept and offered for inspection if requested by immigration officials. Failure to maintain the form is a violation of federal law. Huffington said he did not know what an I-9 form was.

* Arianna Huffington said the employee was hired in May, 1989, about the time of the birth of the couple’s first daughter. She said she did not begin paying taxes on the woman’s salary until June, 1990. “I have not paid the taxes from ’89 to 1990,” she said.

* Asked why she waited more than a year before seeking federal documents to allow the woman to stay in the country legally, Arianna Huffington said she was waiting for the outcome of an immigration bill in Congress that might have granted the woman amnesty.

“During that time, the immigration bill was going through the House of Representative s,” she said. “We did not quite know what would happen, whether she was somebody who might be given amnesty in November, 1990. After the bill was signed, I started the process of labor certification.”

But several experts interviewed by The Times said there was no amnesty law considered in 1990. “There was absolutely no new amnesty, and if that’s her excuse, she better rethink it quickly,” said Peter A. Schey, who heads the Los Angeles-based Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law.

* Arianna Huffington said the woman worked at the household full time until the summer of 1993. Three sources told The Times, however, that her employment continued until at least November. One source also told The Times that the woman worked in the home for a period this past spring during the Senate race.

* To acquire a labor certificate for a foreign resident, federal law requires that the employer prove that no U.S. citizen is capable of doing the job. The Huffingtons, who said they paid the worker $35,000 a year, were asked why they could not find a U.S. citizen to employ at that wage.

“When you have a child and you are interviewing someone to take care of that child, that is the most important interview you will ever have in your entire life,” Huffington responded. Later in the news conference he admitted, however, that he was not present at the interview of the nanny because he was living in Texas and working at his family’s oil and gas company.

After the search for other employees, Arianna Huffington said she concluded that the best candidate was her nanny, whom she identified in the press conference by the name Marisela.

“I have never found anybody who could replace Marisela,” Arianna Huffington said. “Yes, we could have afforded any child-care provider, but you cannot buy love for your children, and Marisela loves them to this day. If you go to her home, it is full of pictures of my children. The only phone number that my 5-year-old knows by heart is Marisela’s number. She calls her regularly. She still cannot, to this day, understand why Marisela is not with us.”

The candidate said he knew of his children’s attachment, but he made a mistake in not forcing the woman to leave the household anyway.

Arianna’s “instinct was kind and it was generous, but according to the law, it was wrong,” he said. “While I was not personally involved in the hiring process, I must take full responsibility . As the head of my household, the buck stops with me. I should have put my foot down, ignored the pleas of my wife and my daughter, and demanded that my wife terminate the woman’s employment. But I didn’t. That was my decision, and it was my responsibility .”

Experts were mixed on how much political damage the revelations will do to the Huffington campaign.

Longtime Republican consultant Sal Russo downplayed the damage it would cause and said at most it was an embarrassment to Huffington.

“While it provides some degree of embarrassment, particularly in view of the stand he just took on 187, people have sympathy for people who are trying to find child care help. Oftentimes, it’s the only person you can find.

Veteran Democratic consultant Richie Ross said that by hiring an illegal immigrant, Huffington was no different from most Californians who take advantage of the low cost of immigrant labor. But supporting Proposition 187, he said, illustrated Huffington’s hypocrisy.

“It may say more about the absurdity of Proposition 187 and the absurdity of his support for Proposition 187,” Ross said. “All the candidates have been taking tons of money from people who employ illegal immigrants. They hold their fund-raisers in hotels staffed by illegal immigrants. . . . I’m delighted he got caught in it. It’s always fun when you see someone hoist himself on his own petard.”

24
General Discussion / Re: $32k/month is pretty good for being a FAKE
« on: March 25, 2024, 01:53:41 PM »
To divert the paparazzi's attention so they will follow her instead of the real Megan Fox...

25
General Discussion / Re: ROCKY... can you...
« on: March 25, 2024, 01:52:03 PM »
No hmgLIAR is not "banned" but when he comes back, he'll LIE that he was "banned" like the last few times..

26
...has to be in a relationship:

Quote
Law Student, 28, Sets a No-Men Rule for Herself After 'Miserable' Dating Experience: 'Never Been Happier'

"I genuinely think I look at life differently," Carly Galluzzo said of her decision to swear off relationships

One graduate student has officially said goodbye to the dating scene.

Carly Galluzzo, a law student from Long Island, New York, has cut out relationships from her life after 16 years of disastrous dating that left her mental health and self-worth affected.

"I think I was dating because all of my friends have been pairing up for so long, and that was driving me to find a partner. But I don't think that was a good motivation," she told SWNS. "I felt that I had to keep dating."

"It didn't matter whether the men were good or not. At the end of the day, my outlook on it was also not good," continued Galluzzo, 28. "It was just something that I feared that if I didn't pursue something straight away, I'd miss out on something."

According to Galluzzo, she began to realize that everything in her life revolved around her quest to find a relationship.

"The only conversations I'd have with college girlfriends were about boyfriends and finding a partner," she told SWNS.

The student also told the outlet that she discovered her "journey with materialism" went hand in hand with her dating life, explaining, "The quickest way to money is dating a wealthy guy, which, of course, can be amazing, but I know what's important now — real happiness and not just these monetary things."

"My ex-boyfriend was very wealthy and took me to a lot of great places and that validation from my peers felt good. But I can say now I've lived that life crying my eyes out on a yacht in the South of France," she continued. "I was so miserable and I was willing to give up my happiness for that."

27
...migrants/illegals and bring up border crisis but also have no problem hired their cheap labor to do the work on their farms  :idiot2::

Quote
The town that can’t live without migrants, but isn't sure it wants to live with them
Fremont, Nebraska, has three massive meat-processing plants that need workers. It also requires anyone renting a home to sign a declaration that they’re in the U.S. legally.


FREMONT, Neb. — Big-city mayors may be complaining about the economic impact of an influx of migrants, but the residents of a small city near Omaha can’t decide how they feel.

Fremont, Nebraska, population 27,000, has three massive meat-processing plants. As young locals leave in search of better jobs, Central American migrants have been taking their places in the slaughterhouse s, especially after Costco opened a huge rotisserie chicken facility in 2019.

“We need these people,” said Mark Jensen, president of the city council. “We need this work done. This is what feeds the nation and the world.”

28
General Discussion / $32k/month is pretty good for being a FAKE
« on: March 25, 2024, 12:42:18 AM »
I’m a Megan Fox lookalike — it’s hectic, but I make nearly $32K a month as her doppelganger

The demand for Megan Fox lookalikes must be high, especially after “Love is Blind’s” Chelsea Blackwell claimed she resembles the Hollywood scarlet. However, one British woman says she too looks like the “Jennifer’s Body” actress and her clients can second that.

Taylor Ryan, 26, revealed she makes nearly $32,000 a month as a Megan Fox lookalike.

“There’s a lot of hard work that goes into it. It’s extremely time-consuming,” the brunette told SWNS.


29
Beverly Hills mansion where Menendez brothers murdered their parents sells for $17 million

The California home where brothers Joseph Lyle Menéndez and Erik Galen Menéndez murdered their parents has found a buyer. The 9,063-square-foot seven-bedroom Mediterranean-style estate closed on Wednesday at a price of $17 million, according to its listing held by Amy Vertun of Rodeo Realty.



30
General Discussion / Asian woman and her BC, WOW!!
« on: March 22, 2024, 02:13:33 PM »
Wen who had 61,000 bitcoin worth $1.8 billion seized by police found guilty of money laundering

Jian Wen was convicted of money laundering offense in a court in London on Wednesday. In 2021, police seized 61,000 bitcoin from digital wallets linked to the Chinese takeaway worker. Wen converted the crypto into cash and other assets on behalf of an international fraudster.





Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 1785
Advertisements