When dealing with theKing, you have to look at the motive of his responses. His motives are generally not related to the actual topic, it's more along the lines of:
1. Angry response. -name calling, repeating a previous argument he's lost, totally out of context "no land", "foaming", "Trump's.." etc
2. Trying to look smart even when everyone else can see that he has nothing to contribute to the discussion because his ideas are flawed. - using the universal response that would apply to almost any situation: depends. or "love it" with quotes from others
3. Just trying to get the last word in on a thread he killed off by hijacking it with his crude comments that's aimed at bullying other PHers. -Pretty much every thread that ends with him having the last word in.
What else?
When dealing with the YAK, you have to look at the motive of his responses. His motives are generally not related to the actual topic, it's more along the lines of:
1. Making ignorant claims like "no land in the Bay Area" then when proven wrong with factual evidence that there are still land available, he foams badly instead of taking ownership of his wrongs and learn from it and then...
2. He make up stuff like the strategy he borrowed from his fellow member (BNM) by claiming the other person said, the land in the Bay Area is "cheap" but when challenged to prove it, he just tuck and run and then foam some more...and then
3. He'll cry "ignore" and tries really hard to abide by his words but because his foam is spewing so badly, he can't help but to crawl back ...which makes him as worthless as his worthless words...
"What else?"
1. He'll solicitate female PH members feedback because he "don't know" but once they take the time to reply to him, he questioned their answers like an know it all...even though he initially said, the "don't know"...
....
Topic: Listening to May Vang stories... (Read 6173 times)