Wiki is not considered a reliable source because contents can change. That doesn't mean what's in the quote is not true. Look it up and tell me which part of the quote is false. Then you can laugh, otherwise, you're just being stupid because the information is very verifiable.

Since you're all too lazy, here's where the sources for the wikipedia statements came from (laughing now?):
"STANDING COMMITTEE ONTHE FEDERAL JUDICIARY RATINGS OF ARTICLE III AND ARTICLE IV JUDICIAL NOMINEES 116TH CONGRESS" (PDF). American Bar Association. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
"Federal judicial nominee lacks enough experience, ABA says in letter explaining 'not qualified' rating". ABA Journal. Retrieved October 14, 2020.