Advertisement

Author Topic: Hollyweird?  (Read 936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Visualmon

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 11047
  • Gender: Male
  • Dark Wargreymon
  • Respect: +566
    • View Profile
Hollyweird?
« on: August 01, 2023, 05:27:28 AM »
Does anyone heard about the new movie made by Mel Gibson, Sound of Freedom?

Not sure the movie plot has to do with the exposure of Hollywood industry as somewhat dark. As far as the trailer goes, it depicts some villains are doing child trafficking on young girls. I do not get the analogy.

Mel Gibson, Denzel Washington, Mark Walhberg are Christians. Mel Gibson directed a few movies that do not tie with Hollywood. He cast himself as William Wallace in Braveheart. He also cast himself as Paul Revere in The Patriot. Denzel Washington also directed a few movies as well: Antwone Fisher, The Equalizer, and Great Debaters. Mark Wahlberg produced his own films: Contraband, Deepwater Horizon, Father Stu, The Fighter.

I have no idea what the heck they're talking about. Even the Rock, Dwayne Johnson, thinks these guys are sort of looney.   



Like this post: 0
There's no need for you to hide. I already saw you.

Adverstisement

Offline hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 44455
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +217
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2023, 07:04:23 AM »
HUNG-LOW been bragging about that movie in here
apparently it some kind of movie them republican seem to like and promote these day
human trafficking and stuff

i don't know why it just a big deal
there already lots of human trafficking movies out there

one of my favorite trafficking movie
 :2funny: :2funny:



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline Hung_Low

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 11643
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +294
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2023, 11:24:23 AM »
HUNG-LOW been bragging about that movie in here
apparently it some kind of movie them republican seem to like and promote these day
human trafficking and stuff

i don't know why it just a big deal
there already lots of human trafficking movies out there

one of my favorite trafficking movie
 :2funny: :2funny:


Hmmm... So promoting the horror of child-sex trafficking and kidnapping is a Republican thing? Is that the reason why the Lefties/Demmies and you are so against promoting it? 'Taken' is not about trafficking, it's about a father's rage and what length he'll go to to get his daughter back... if you pay attention, the rest of the series has nothing to do with trafficking.

Does anyone heard about the new movie made by Mel Gibson, Sound of Freedom?

Not sure the movie plot has to do with the exposure of Hollywood industry as somewhat dark. As far as the trailer goes, it depicts some villains are doing child trafficking on young girls. I do not get the analogy.

Mel Gibson, Denzel Washington, Mark Walhberg are Christians. Mel Gibson directed a few movies that do not tie with Hollywood. He cast himself as William Wallace in Braveheart. He also cast himself as Paul Revere in The Patriot. Denzel Washington also directed a few movies as well: Antwone Fisher, The Equalizer, and Great Debaters. Mark Wahlberg produced his own films: Contraband, Deepwater Horizon, Father Stu, The Fighter.

I have no idea what the heck they're talking about. Even the Rock, Dwayne Johnson, thinks these guys are sort of looney.   

It is a low budget ($14millions) movie base on actual events of Tim Ballard, a US agent who left the agency to create 'Operation Underground Railroad' - an anti-sex trafficking organization, on his journey to rescue children from child-sex Traffickers.

The Left, Hollywood and HmongRock is so against it because it sheds light into the dark horror of child-sex kidnapping, trafficking, etc etc. from real events - not some fake movie like Taken.

The movie has nothing to do with the dark secret of Hollywood. However, Hollywood and entertainment industry refused to carry the movie or write anything good about the movie. If you listen to the Left and their MSM machines, they all came out trying to destroy the movie calling it a conspiracy theory movie created to pander to the Far Right and QAnon crowd. Child-sex trafficking is real, not some conspiracy theory that's being pushed by the Far Right and QAnon... Vox even came out saying that promoting this movie is equivalent to the trafficking/kidnapping itself.



Like this post: 0
- Maxi pad not greatest thing on earth but next to it.

Offline hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 44455
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +217
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2023, 11:43:04 AM »
Hmmm... So promoting the horror of child-sex trafficking and kidnapping is a Republican thing? Is that the reason why the Lefties/Demmies and you are so against promoting it? 'Taken' is not about trafficking, it's about a father's rage and what length he'll go to to get his daughter back... if you pay attention, the rest of the series has nothing to do with trafficking.

It is a low budget ($14millions) movie base on actual events of Tim Ballard, a US agent who left the agency to create 'Operation Underground Railroad' - an anti-sex trafficking organization, on his journey to rescue children from child-sex Traffickers.

The Left, Hollywood and HmongRock is so against it because it sheds light into the dark horror of child-sex kidnapping, trafficking, etc etc. from real events - not some fake movie like Taken.

Different folks
Different stroke

I like action pack movie and superhero movies
Pay money bill to be entertained not all drama sad

I don’t have anything against the movie
Like i say
We and VISUALMON don’t even know about this movie till u bought it up


DONT KNOW DONT CARE
 ;D ;D



Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline hmgROCK

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 44455
  • The Hmong Nostradamus
  • Respect: +217
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2023, 11:50:33 AM »

The Left, Hollywood and HmongRock is so against it because it sheds light into the dark horror of child-sex kidnapping, trafficking, etc etc. from real events - not some fake movie like Taken.

The movie has nothing to do with the dark secret of Hollywood. However, Hollywood and entertainment industry refused to carry the movie or write anything good about the movie. If you listen to the Left and their MSM machines, they all came out trying to destroy the movie calling it a conspiracy theory movie created to pander to the Far Right and QAnon crowd. Child-sex trafficking is real, not some conspiracy theory that's being pushed by the Far Right and QAnon... Vox even came out saying that promoting this movie is equivalent to the trafficking/kidnapping itself.

Bro

I don’t know even know this movie even existed in the first place
You come here on PH and put words in my mouth
And say i hate something I don’t even know about

 ;D ;D

Yall people are hella crazy mental


You say stuff
And claim i say it
Maybe it was just you all along
Hating





Like this post: 0
God did not created man...man created god

Offline DuMa

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 18007
  • Gender: Male
  • -(>^_^<)- 052806
  • Respect: +749
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2023, 01:16:39 PM »
A movie is a job that pays.  They need to eat too.

However, some have turned down a role due to their own agenda or "feelings" towards it after reading the script.   That is ok because someone else needs work and will gladly pick up that job. 

Wonder women, original was not gal gadot.
Will smith turned down the matrix and keanu took it.  Same dude with too much money turned down Django.
Emily Blunt turned down the black widow in iron man. Scarlett a better sex symbol anyway.   
Gwyneth Paltrow turned down the Rose role in titanic
Travolta was close to becoming forest gump
Tom Selleck and indiana jones
Joaquin Phoenix and doctor strange
Pacino and Die hard
Tom cruise almost the iron man but Robert downey jr played better



Like this post: 0
X_____________ ______________ ______________ ___

Offline Visualmon

  • Elite Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 11047
  • Gender: Male
  • Dark Wargreymon
  • Respect: +566
    • View Profile
Re: Hollyweird?
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2023, 08:41:41 PM »
A movie is a job that pays.  They need to eat too.

However, some have turned down a role due to their own agenda or "feelings" towards it after reading the script.   That is ok because someone else needs work and will gladly pick up that job. 

Wonder women, original was not gal gadot.
Will smith turned down the matrix and keanu took it.  Same dude with too much money turned down Django.
Emily Blunt turned down the black widow in iron man. Scarlett a better sex symbol anyway.   
Gwyneth Paltrow turned down the Rose role in titanic
Travolta was close to becoming forest gump
Tom Selleck and indiana jones
Joaquin Phoenix and doctor strange
Pacino and Die hard
Tom cruise almost the iron man but Robert downey jr played better


Christians need a job and money to survive?  ??? Ain't their main jobs are to follow and serve Jesus alone instead of serving worldly men?

Suppose the Holy Spirit and Jesus's job to feed you Mana bread + wine and shelter you for free. 



Like this post: 0
There's no need for you to hide. I already saw you.

 

Advertisements