This is why this rambling sees no end. If one would just try to understand the type of environments in each case, one would know there's varying danger levels in each of them which makes your argument worthless. Same goes to your changing rape scenario, changing the situation of how and when it occurs totally changes the whole case(rejected motion). I will honestly tell you that I would see no danger and rape would be unwarranted if she invite him to her home for a drink. But seriously, do you seriously think this gives you kudos. I still stand my position that she endanger herself. And hey, I never said the dog is/was innocent. I'm simply standing by that this woman put herself in danger which is why she is fukked up and now has to face a counter lawsuit. Dude is guilty, but under what guise? "I was totally drunk, it had a horrible itch..." line? Does that make him any less innocent, what about drunk drivers that kill someone? Rape is just way too harsh. Which is all the more reason to sue the victim or the government.lol
Perhaps you're "rambling" but not me. I've countered your every point. And here goes another counter to your "worthless" points. You missed the simple point of that "environment" wasn't "danger" but the primitive idiot that decides to take advantage of the vulnerable victim is. Otherwise the other women that attended would've been violated too if it's the environment that's dangerous. Since you brought up "environment", how about all those women that were raped in their own homes??
Think real hard if you have enough brain cell to see this simple fact: The environment can be at college, home, at a park, etc., but the real "danger" is the primitive idiot that decides to violate another person.
And no one said, you said the raper was "innocent" so bringing that up is "worthless".
That primitive idiot can counter sue all he wants but I highly doubt it'll go anywhere...Sim
ple fact: he made a poor decision, and he knew he did wrong...Which is why he tried real hard to cover it up.
Again if that victim asked to be raped then she is to blame but since she just happens to be there and has no control over her raper's primitive behaviors, she is not at fault.