Advertisement

Author Topic: Remember the 'evil' of ivermectin usage for COVID?  (Read 27 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hung_Low

  • Sr. Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 9701
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +248
    • View Profile
Remember the 'evil' of ivermectin usage for COVID?
« on: March 25, 2024, 11:18:42 AM »
The FDA is now forced to removed Anti-Ivermectin messages from all social media or claiming that it's for horse use only. They still "Do Not" recommend it as a treatment for COVID but can't say anything that is anti-Ivermectin. The case was brought on by doctors claiming the FDA is interfering with their ability to practice medicine. The court agreed and says that the FDA is not a physicians and even a tweet-size medication is beyond their authority.

The FDA settled and will now removed all social media post in regards to anti-ivermectin.

As y'all know, Ivermectin is used both on animal and human and it's not just a "horse paste" and for animal only as the jab happy people keep pushing. The issue became a hot topic after Joe Rogan says he was prescribed by his physician.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted "Ivermectin is not an exceptional case. The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma?" Not just the FDA but the CDC and majority of doctors. I know that doctors get kickback for prescribing certain medication - vacation trip, cash/prize incentives, etc etc
Don't believe me... just google it - there are laws that allows these pharma company to offer 'legal' incentives to doctors that prescribe their medication.



Like this post: 0
- Maxi pad not greatest thing on earth but next to it.

Adverstisement

 

Advertisements