I keep reading and hearing reviews people saying it's slow and that it needs more power.
200 hp is alot in my books(coming from a 4 cylinder N/A point of view) yeah it's not blazing fast but is the BRZ/FRS really lagging around that much that it's noticable?
My civic has 200, and it feels plenty of power and plenty fast when I can get it in gear and shift right.
In my prelude I gave to my little brother, it has 200 hp, and it feels plenty fast.
My GSR only has 170, and it feels plenty fast.
I never drove the type R but when it came out, it only had 195 and I've never heard anyone complain about it being slow or needing more hp, it was nothing but praises, I know it was a lighter car but still.
I'm sure the BRZ would feel about the same, it is 100hp/liter.
I know none of these cars are break neck speed, but I know when those cars came out, nobody was complaining about their sub 200 hp.
The twins come out and all you hear is "It could use more hp, it shouldn've came with a turbo" etc etc etc...
Is it really that slow?
Car and dRiver 6.4, that's pretty good for sub 200hp cars in my opinion.
http://www.caranddriver.com/subaru/brzI don't think it was meant to be whatever folks thought it was suppose to be.
The only thing I can think of is that the class it's competing agianst, the majority of theml have higher hp output.
I don't know why people are doing comparison's with it to the s2000, and mustang gt's. I think those two cars are way out of it's league.
But I will note one thing, when the type R came out, it was consistently running with cars above it's class and blowing cars in it's class out of the water.
I guess "it needs more power" is becuase folks expected it to be blow the cars in it's class out of the water and run with cars above it's class.
Maybe the BRZ/FRS came out 10-15 years to late?
But dang those ugly painted calipers, I probably would trade my civic for that if it wasn't for that.