Let's break apart this flimsy argument....
How is it absurd that science was one of the many causes? An airstrike is caused by people who used scientifically made items. It's an airstrike, airstrike uses whatever concoction of chemicals, gases, technology, etc. to create a chemical reaction which led to the picture he posted. Which all is part of science.
1. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Remember that argument that you support so much? Well, science doesn't kill people, people kill people. You are wrong on one of those argument. We can stop here, but let's keep going...
2. You don't know understand what science is. Look up the definition of science, and see if it supports you. But even if you think it supports you...
3. If you are right about the science argument, you disprove God. So which is it?
4. If God is the creator of all things, then he also created science. So, God is still responsible. Your argument still doesn't make any sense.
So you see, even if you think you are right, you are wrong on something else. Thus, hmgrock wins this argument by default because you made such an absurd argument.